医学
结肠镜检查
随机对照试验
生活质量(医疗保健)
内科学
胶囊
不利影响
艰难梭菌
移植
外科
结直肠癌
微生物学
癌症
护理部
植物
抗生素
生物
作者
Dina Kao,Brandi Roach,Marisela Silva,Paul L. Beck,Kevin P. Rioux,Gilaad G. Kaplan,Hsiu‐Ju Chang,Stephanie Coward,Karen J. Goodman,Huiping Xu,Karen Madsen,Andrew L. Mason,Gane Ka‐Shu Wong,Juan Jovel,Jordan Patterson,Thomas Louie
出处
期刊:JAMA
[American Medical Association]
日期:2017-11-28
卷期号:318 (20): 1985-1985
被引量:523
标识
DOI:10.1001/jama.2017.17077
摘要
Importance
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective in preventing recurrentClostridium difficileinfection (RCDI). However, it is not known whether clinical efficacy differs by route of delivery. Objective
To determine whether FMT by oral capsule is noninferior to colonoscopy delivery in efficacy. Design, Setting, and Participants
Noninferiority, unblinded, randomized trial conducted in 3 academic centers in Alberta, Canada. A total of 116 adult patients with RCDI were enrolled between October 2014 and September 2016, with follow-up to December 2016. The noninferiority margin was 15%. Interventions
Participants were randomly assigned to FMT by capsule or by colonoscopy at a 1:1 ratio. Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was the proportion of patients without RCDI 12 weeks after FMT. Secondary outcomes included (1) serious and minor adverse events, (2) changes in quality of life by the 36-Item Short Form Survey on a scale of 0 (worst possible quality of life) to 100 (best quality of life), and (3) patient perception on a scale of 1 (not at all unpleasant) to 10 (extremely unpleasant) and satisfaction on a scale of 1 (best) to 10 (worst). Results
Among 116 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 58 [19] years; 79 women [68%]), 105 (91%) completed the trial, with 57 patients randomized to the capsule group and 59 to the colonoscopy group. In per-protocol analysis, prevention of RCDI after a single treatment was achieved in 96.2% in both the capsule group (51/53) and the colonoscopy group (50/52) (difference, 0%; 1-sided 95% CI, −6.1% to infinity;P < .001), meeting the criterion for noninferiority. One patient in each group died of underlying cardiopulmonary illness unrelated to FMT. Rates of minor adverse events were 5.4% for the capsule group vs 12.5% for the colonoscopy group. There was no significant between-group difference in improvement in quality of life. A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving capsules rated their experience as "not at all unpleasant" (66% vs 44%; difference, 22% [95% CI, 3%-40%];P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance
Among adults with RCDI, FMT via oral capsules was not inferior to delivery by colonoscopy for preventing recurrent infection over 12 weeks. Treatment with oral capsules may be an effective approach to treating RCDI. Trial Registration
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT02254811
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI