前馈
控制器(灌溉)
传递函数
转换器
模型预测控制
反馈线性化
输出阻抗
控制理论(社会学)
计算机科学
控制工程
电压
工程类
电阻抗
控制(管理)
人工智能
电气工程
生物
农学
作者
Shuai Shao,Linglin Chen,Zhenyu Shan,Fei Gao,Hui Chen,Deshang Sha,Tomislav Dragičević
出处
期刊:IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
[Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers]
日期:2021-08-30
卷期号:37 (2): 1524-1547
被引量:183
标识
DOI:10.1109/tpel.2021.3108157
摘要
The article classifies, describes and critically compares different modeling techniques and control methods for dual active bridge (DAB) dc-dc converters and provides explicit guidance about DAB controller design to practicing engineers and researchers.Firstly, available modeling methods for DAB including reduced order model, generalized average model and discrete-time model are classified and quantitatively compared using simulation results.Based on this comparison, recommendations for suitable DAB modeling method are given.Then we comprehensively review the available control methods including feedback-only control, linearization control, feedforward plus feedback, disturbance-observer-based control, feedforward current control, model predictive current control, sliding mode control and moving discretized control set model predictive control.Frequency responses of the closed-loop control-to-output and output impedance are selected as the metrics of the ability in voltage tracking and the load disturbance rejection performance.The frequency response plots of closed-loop control-to-output transfer function and output impedance of each control method are theoretically derived or swept using simulation software PLECS and MATLAB.Based on these plots, remarks on each control method are drawn.Some practical control issues for DAB including dead time effect, phase drift and dc magnetic flux bias are also reviewed.This paper is accompanied by PLECS simulation files of the reviewed control methods.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI