Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) screening superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) in the detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in the elderly?

蒙特利尔认知评估 认知障碍 小型精神状态检查 认知 心理信息 纳入和排除标准 医学 听力学 心理学 老年学 精神科 梅德林 病理 政治学 法学 替代医学
作者
Tiago Coimbra Costa Pinto,Leonardo Machado,Tatiana M. Bulgacov,A. L. Rodrigues,María Lúcia Gurgel da Costa,Rosana Christine Cavalcanti Ximenes,Éverton Botelho Sougey
出处
期刊:International Psychogeriatrics 卷期号:31 (04): 491-504 被引量:402
标识
DOI:10.1017/s1041610218001370
摘要

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the accuracy of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in tracking mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Method: A Systematic review of the PubMed, Bireme, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo databases was conducted. Using inclusion and exclusion criteria and staring with 1,629 articles, 34 articles were selected. The quality of the selected research was evaluated through the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool (QUADAS-2). Result: More than 80% of the articles showed MoCA to be superior to MMSE in discriminating between individuals with mild cognitive impairment and no cognitive impairment. The area under the curve varied from 0.71 to 0.99 for MoCA, and 0.43 to 0.94 for MMSE, when evaluating the ability to discriminate MCI in the cognitively healthy elderly individuals, and 0.87 to 0.99 and 0.67 to 0.99, respectively, when evaluating the detection of AD. The AUC mean value for MoCA was significantly larger compared to the MMSE in discriminating MCI from control [0.883 (CI 95% 0.855-0.912) vs MMSE 0.780 (CI 95% 0.740-0.820) p < 0.001]. Conclusion: The screening tool MoCA is superior to MMSE in the identification of MCI, and both tests were found to be accurate in the detection of AD.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
铜W完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
科研通AI5应助张立人采纳,获得10
1秒前
Eileen发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
铜W发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
清1031发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
yuyuyu发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
刘荻萩应助feilong采纳,获得20
6秒前
Bambi完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
xde的玩偶完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
文静灵阳发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
kingwill应助正直涔雨采纳,获得20
7秒前
yyds给biox的求助进行了留言
7秒前
秋水完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
shen完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
wwqdd发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
黄瓜蕉完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
科研废物发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
kingwill应助仚屳采纳,获得20
10秒前
10秒前
抹茶肥肠发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Eileen完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
Chen272发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
万能图书馆应助夏青荷采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
科研通AI5应助默默的妙竹采纳,获得10
12秒前
anan完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
秋水发布了新的文献求助30
13秒前
14秒前
zhuiyu完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Kelsen’s Legacy: Legal Normativity, International Law and Democracy 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3543189
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3120593
关于积分的说明 9343357
捐赠科研通 2818645
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1549711
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 722221
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 713076