The use of copy number loads to designate mosaicism in blastocyst stage PGT-A cycles: fewer is better

胚泡 内细胞团 活检 非整倍体 生物 倍性 染色体 男科 胚胎 遗传学 病理 医学 胚胎发生 基因
作者
Laura Girardi,Matteo Figliuzzi,Maurizio Poli,Münevver Serdarogullari,Cristina Patassini,Silvia Caroselli,I Pergher,Francesco Cogo,Önder Coban,Fazilet Kübra Boynukalın,Mustafa Bahçeci,Roser Navarro,Carmen Rubio,Necati Fındıklı,Carlos Simón,Antonio Capalbo
出处
期刊:Human Reproduction [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:38 (5): 982-991 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dead049
摘要

Abstract STUDY QUESTION How well can whole chromosome copy number analysis from a single trophectoderm (TE) biopsy predict true mosaicism configurations in human blastocysts? SUMMARY ANSWER When a single TE biopsy is tested, wide mosaicism thresholds (i.e. 20–80% of aneuploid cells) increase false positive calls compared to more stringent ones (i.e. 30–70% of aneuploid cells) without improving true detection rate, while binary classification (aneuploid/euploid) provides the highest diagnostic accuracy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Next-generation sequencing-based technologies for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) allow the identification of intermediate chromosome copy number alterations potentially associated with chromosomal mosaicism in TE biopsies. Most validation studies are based on models mimicking mosaicism, e.g. mixtures of cell lines, and cannot be applied to the clinical interpretation of TE biopsy specimens. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The accuracy of different mosaicism diagnostic thresholds was assessed by comparing chromosome copy numbers in multiple samples from each blastocyst. Enrolled embryos were donated for research between June 2019 and September 2020. The Institutional Review Board at the Near East University approved the study (project: YDU/2019/70-849). Embryos showing euploid/aneuploid mosaicism (n = 53), uniform chromosomal alterations (single or multiple) (n = 25), or uniform euploidy (n = 39) in their clinical TE biopsy were disaggregated into five portions: the inner cell mass (ICM) and four TE segments. Collectively, 585 samples from 117 embryos were analysed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Donated blastocysts were warmed, allowed to re-expand, and disaggregated in TE portions and ICM. PGT-A analysis was performed using Ion ReproSeq PGS kit and Ion S5 sequencer (ThermoFisher). Sequencing data were blindly analysed with Ion Reporter software to estimate raw chromosome copy numbers. Intra-blastocyst comparison of copy number data was performed employing different thresholds commonly used for mosaicism detection. From copy number data, different case scenarios were created using more stringent (30–70%) or less stringent criteria (20–80%). Categorical variables were compared using the two-sample z test for proportions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE When all the five biopsies from the same embryo were analysed with 30–70% thresholds, only 8.4% (n = 14/166) of patterns abnormal in the original analysis revealed a true mosaic configuration, displaying evidence of reciprocal events (3.6%, n = 6/166) or confirmation in additional biopsies (4.8%, n = 8/166), while most mosaic results (87.3% of total predicted mosaic patterns) remained confined to a single TE specimen. Conversely, uniform whole chromosome aneuploidies (28.3% of total patterns, n = 47/166) were confirmed in all subsequent biopsies in 97.9% of cases (n = 46/47). When 20–80% thresholds were employed (instead of 30–70%), the overall mosaicism rate per biopsy increased from 20.2% (n = 114/565) to 40.2% (n = 227/565). However, the use of a wider threshold range did not contribute to the detection of additional true mosaic patterns, while significantly increasing false positive mosaic patterns from 57.8% to 79.5% (n = 96/166; 95% CI = 49.9–65.4 vs n = 271/341; 95% CI = 74.8–83.6, respectively) (P < 0.00001). Moreover, the shift of the aneuploid cut-off from 70% to 80% of aneuploid cells resulted in mosaicism overcalling in the high range (50–80% of aneuploid cells), impacting the accuracy of uniform aneuploid classification. Parametric analysis of thresholds, based on multifocal analysis, revealed that a binary classification scheme with a single cut-off at a 50% level provided the highest sensitivity and specificity rates. Further analysis on technical noise distribution at the chromosome level revealed a greater impact on smaller chromosomes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION While enrolment of a population enriched in embryos showing intermediate chromosome copy numbers enhanced the evaluation of the mosaicism category compared with random sampling such study population selection is likely to lead to an overall underestimation of PGT-A accuracy compared to a general assessment of unselected clinical samples. This approach involved the analysis of aneuploidy chromosome copy number thresholds at the embryo level; future studies will need to evaluate these criteria in relation to clinical predictive values following embryo transfers for different PGT-A assays. Moreover, the study lacked genotyping-based confirmation analysis. Finally, aneuploid embryos with known meiotic partial deletion/duplication were not included. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Current technologies can detect low-intermediate chromosome copy numbers in preimplantation embryos but their identification is poorly correlated with consistent propagation of the anomaly throughout the embryo or with negative clinical consequences when transferred. Therefore, when a single TE biopsy is analysed, diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism should be evaluated carefully. Indeed, the use of wider mosaicism thresholds (i.e. 20–80%) should be avoided as it reduces the overall PGT-A diagnostic accuracy by increasing the risk of false positive mosaic classification and false negative aneuploid classification. From a clinical perspective, this approach has negative consequences for patients as it leads to the potential deselection of normal embryos for transfer. Moreover, a proportion of uniform aneuploid embryos may be inaccurately categorized as high-level mosaic, with a consequent negative outcome (i.e. miscarriage) when inadvertently selected for transfer. Clinical outcomes following PGT-A are maximized when a 50% threshold is employed as it offers the most accurate diagnostic approach. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was supported by Igenomix. The authors not employed by Igenomix have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Ajax完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
壮观道罡发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
SciGPT应助小文采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
细腻慕儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
科研文献搬运工应助CX采纳,获得20
2秒前
我是老大应助单纯的凝芙采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
松原花音完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
追寻惜筠发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
完美世界应助炙热的发带采纳,获得10
6秒前
刘翔完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
阔达小懒虫完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
kuai0Yu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
脑洞疼应助山那边的山采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
12秒前
轻松的静竹完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
肉卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
16秒前
simpleblue发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
Pursuit发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
orixero应助tooty采纳,获得10
17秒前
王讯完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
海阔凭宇跃完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
Ivy发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
Min完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
英俊的铭应助炙热的发带采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
zouxlin3完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
纯真的雨发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
hanliulaixi完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
小文发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Yiy关闭了Yiy文献求助
21秒前
小糊涂发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
Impact of Mitophagy-Related Genes on the Diagnosis and Development of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Single-Cell RNA-seq Analysis and Machine Learning Algorithms 2000
How to Create Beauty: De Lairesse on the Theory and Practice of Making Art 1000
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 670
大平正芳: 「戦後保守」とは何か 550
2019第三届中国LNG储运技术交流大会论文集 500
Contributo alla conoscenza del bifenile e dei suoi derivati. Nota XV. Passaggio dal sistema bifenilico a quello fluorenico 500
Multiscale Thermo-Hydro-Mechanics of Frozen Soil: Numerical Frameworks and Constitutive Models 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2998307
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2658831
关于积分的说明 7198014
捐赠科研通 2294352
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1216620
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 593560
版权声明 592904