医学
部分流量储备
随机对照试验
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
临床试验
冠状动脉造影
心脏病学
重症监护医学
内科学
心肌梗塞
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.iccl.2022.09.004
摘要
During the past 30 years, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has moved from animal models to class IA recommendations in guidelines. However, the FLOWER-MI, RIPCORD-2, FUTURE, and FAME 3 trials in 2021 were "negative"-has FFR exceeded its expiration date? We critically examine these randomized trials in order to draw insights not just about FFR but also about study design and interpretation. Are all randomized trials created equal? No, rather we must focus on discordant decisions between angiography and FFR and highlight clinical endpoints that can be improved by percutaneous coronary intervention instead of medical therapy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI