A scoping review on the GLIM criteria for malnutrition diagnosis: Understanding how and for which purpose it has been applied in studies on hospital settings

医学 营养不良 背景(考古学) 斯科普斯 体质指数 人口 梅德林 老年学 内科学 环境卫生 政治学 生物 古生物学 法学
作者
Danielle Silla Jobim Milanez,Elisa Loch Razzera,Ingrid da Silveira Knobloch,Júlia Lima,Simone Bernardes,Flávia Moraes Silva
出处
期刊:Clinical Nutrition [Elsevier]
卷期号:42 (1): 29-44 被引量:16
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.10.022
摘要

This scoping review aimed to identify and map the literature on malnutrition diagnosis made using the GLIM criteria in hospitalized patients.The scoping review was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science (until 16 April 2022) to identify studies based on the 'population' (adults or elderly patients), 'concept' (malnutrition diagnosis by the GLIM criteria), and 'context' (hospital settings) framework. Titles/abstracts were screened, and two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies.Ninety-six studies were eligible (35.4% from China, 30.2% involving oncological patients, and 30.5% with prospective data collection), 32 followed the two-step GLIM approach, and 50 applied all the criteria. All the studies evaluated body mass index (BMI), while 92.7% evaluated weight loss; 77.1%, muscle mass; 93.8%, inflammation; and 70.8%, energy intake. A lack of details on the methods adopted for criterion evaluation was observed in five (muscle mass evaluation) to 40 studies (energy intake evaluation). The frequency of the use of the GLIM criteria ranged from 22.2% (frequency of low BMI) to 84.7% (frequency of inflammation), and the malnutrition prevalence ranged from 0.96% to 87.9%. Less than 30% of studies aimed to assess the GLIM criterion validity, eight studies cited the guidance on validation of the GLIM criteria, and a minority implemented it.This map of studies on the GLIM criteria in hospital settings demonstrated that they are applied in a heterogeneous manner, with a wide range of malnutrition prevalence. Almost 50% of the studies applied all the criteria, while one-third followed the straightforward two-step approach. The recommendations of the guidance on validation of the criteria were scarcely adhered to. The gaps that need to be explored in future studies have been highlighted.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
狂野书易完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
娃娃兵完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
芒果布丁发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
prosperp应助爱喝冰阔落采纳,获得10
1秒前
橙子完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
flysky120完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
隐形静芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
二冲完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Sci发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
翟函完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
rebeccahu应助吕小布采纳,获得10
3秒前
liying发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
冉第完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
garden发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
YYYYYYYYY完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
水草帽完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
初心完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
lisa完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
传统的斓完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
共享精神应助踏实的诗筠采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
Jdh发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
米糊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
小萌兽完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
酷酷剑通完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
傲娇的凡旋应助wlf采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
田様应助y彤采纳,获得10
11秒前
无聊的秋刀鱼完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助嗷嗷采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
小池同学完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2500
Востребованный временем 2500
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination : the lunar eclipse tablets of enuma anu enlil 1500
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
Healthcare Finance: Modern Financial Analysis for Accelerating Biomedical Innovation 1000
Classics in Total Synthesis IV: New Targets, Strategies, Methods 1000
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3456102
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3051399
关于积分的说明 9025808
捐赠科研通 2740019
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1503109
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 694680
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 693544