Assessment of Readability of Gynecologic Cancer Clinical Trials Literature at National Cancer Institute - Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers

医学 妇科癌症 可读性 癌症 临床试验 妇科 家庭医学 肿瘤科 医学物理学 内科学 卵巢癌 语言学 哲学
作者
Julia Chalif,Wafa Khadraoui,John L. Hays,Larry J. Copeland,Roberto Vargas,David M. O’Malley,Laura Chambers
出处
期刊:International Journal of Gynecological Cancer [BMJ]
卷期号:: 101693-101693
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101693
摘要

Objective(s)The objective of this study was to assess the readability of patient-facing gynecologic cancer clinical trial information on National Cancer Institute-Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers (NCI-CCCs) websites.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional analysis of publicly accessible information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials on NCI-CCC's websites in September 2023. Clinical trial descriptions for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers were assessed. Websites with limited to no descriptive information regarding their clinical trials were excluded. Readability was assessed using Readability Studio Professional Edition software for five readability metrics (FORCAST, Fry, Gunning Fog, Raygor Estimate, and SMOG).ResultsOf 56 NCI-CCCs evaluated, 78% (n=44) had information pertaining to gynecologic cancer clinical trials and gynecologic clinical trial descriptions for readability analysis. 14% (n=8) lacked clinical trial descriptions and linked to Clinicaltrials.gov and 7% (n=4) only had information available through additional inquiry within the cancer center. Across NCI-CCCs the overall mean reading level across all analysis was 15th grade, or collegiate level reading. The specific readability metric analysis were as follows: FORCAST: 12.4 (9.7-14.7), Fry: 17 (13-17), Gunning Fog: 16.8 (10-19), Raygor Estimate: 16 (7-17), and SMOG: 16.5 (11.4-19). Clinical trial information was stratified by the NCI Geographic Management of Cancer Health Disparities Program (GMaP) with no statistically significant differences in readability or complexity.Conclusion(s)In this analysis of publicly available, patient-facing information on NCI-CCC websites regarding gynecologic cancer clinical trials, the readability scores were above high-school level across the United States, which far exceeds the recommended readability metric of 6th grade by the National Institute of Health. Opportunities exist to improve the readability of gynecologic cancer clinical trial online literature which may facilitate patient access, participation, and understanding.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
黄河学者完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
fc547发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
情怀应助忧郁半青采纳,获得10
3秒前
季思锐发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
yolo发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
yuquhaiku发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
Owen应助池新辰采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
Nole应助豆瓣酱采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
自觉的鹤发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
蒋若风发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
Aurora发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
ww完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
yf2011108002发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
樱sky完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
123发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
诚c发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助诗图采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
醉翁发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
9秒前
9秒前
ne完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
eri发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
高分求助中
Markov Chain Monte Carlo 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Common Foundations of American and East Asian Modernisation: From Alexander Hamilton to Junichero Koizumi 2000
Weaponeering: An Introduction Fourth Edition, Volume 1 1000
Advanced Weaponeering Fourth Edition, Volume 2 1000
悉尼大学博士学位论文,题目:Modelling and testing of one-sided stitched laminated composites. 作者:Kristopher P. Plain 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7517542
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9105484
关于积分的说明 19439223
捐赠科研通 7122615
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3254060
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2422753
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2240944