过程(计算)
计算机科学
形式概念分析
结果(博弈论)
选择(遗传算法)
管理科学
质量(理念)
晋升(国际象棋)
过程管理
风险分析(工程)
医学
人工智能
认识论
工程类
数学
政治学
算法
哲学
数理经济学
政治
法学
操作系统
作者
Misty M. Richmond,Deltra Muoki,Fuqin Liu,Donna Scott Tilley
出处
期刊:Nursing Forum
[Wiley]
日期:2022-11-01
卷期号:57 (6): 1599-1605
被引量:1
摘要
The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance in the process of choosing a method to use for concept analysis (CA), a commonly used method for defining and exploring concepts in nursing. Best outcomes are achieved when there is close alignment between the concept, the purpose of the analysis, and the CA method utilized. This process has become complicated by the number of approaches developed in recent decades, with varying purposes and theoretical underpinnings. Other variables include the specific type of concept chosen and the purpose of the analysis, which may vary from clinical care to theory development to research design. The net result is a process that can be confusing for experienced and inexperienced scholars alike. An overview of the most common CA methods used in recent years, including theoretical underpinnings, intended uses, steps involved in the process, and recommended applications, is followed by detailed guidance in selecting a method to use for the specific concept to be analyzed. Also provided is a discussion of the factors to consider in choosing a concept for analysis. The desired outcome is the promotion of high-quality CA that advance the scholarship of nursing.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI