谵妄
医学
心理干预
荟萃分析
科克伦图书馆
入射(几何)
随机对照试验
梅德林
系统回顾
干预(咨询)
置信区间
重症监护医学
内科学
精神科
物理
法学
光学
政治学
作者
Chenli Xu,Yan Zhang,Dajiang Yuan,Cui-Ling Wang,Xiaoru Wang,Xiaojuan Liang,Junli Wang,Junfang Duan
摘要
To identify, appraise and synthesize current evidence on different sensory-based interventions on delirium prevention in critically ill patients. A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Library, China Biology Medicine, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang and WeiPu databases from inception to 2 June 2022. The data were updated on 24 December 2022. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42021254328). Randomized controlled trials were included. Participants in the included studies were critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, and the interventions involved care by sensory-based intervention. And the outcome was the incidence of delirium rated by the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU Tool. The 14 studies included in the systematic review indicated a reduction in the effectiveness of sensory-based intervention on the incidence of delirium. Subgroup analyses showed significant effects for auditory stimulation (OR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-0.79; p = 0.005) and tactile stimulation (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.87; p = 0.01) but not for the effectiveness of visual intervention on the incidence of delirium (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.38-1.30; p = 0.27). Sensory-based interventions significantly reduce the incidence of delirium in critical patients. It is suggested that when choosing sensory-based interventions, auditory intervention should be preferred.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI