Different strokes for different folks: Examining additive and complimentary effects of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees’ research outcomes.

联盟 心理学 凝聚力(化学) 心理咨询学 自我效能感 医学教育 应用心理学 社会心理学 医学 政治学 有机化学 化学 法学
作者
D. Martin Kivlighan,Rayna C. Narvaez,Walter Carter
出处
期刊:Journal of Counseling Psychology [American Psychological Association]
卷期号:66 (1): 104-113 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.1037/cou0000314
摘要

A primary task of scientific and scientist-practitioner training programs is to assist graduate students in acquiring research skills and, ultimately, developing research and scientific acumen. Informed by Gelso's (1979) model of effective research training environments (RTEs), we assessed the effect of the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. With a sample of 76 counseling psychology doctoral trainees nested within 34 advisors, we examined the association between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion and trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Next, we used polynomial regression and response surface analysis to test the additive and complementary effects between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Univariate analyses indicated that the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion were positively associated with trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity. Moreover, polynomial regression models and response surface analyses indicated an additive effect between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion on trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity, such that trainees' research self-efficacy and research activity were highest when the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion were consistent and high. Lastly, we found a complementary effect between the advisory working alliance and research team cohesion for trainees' research self-efficacy, meaning research self-efficacy was highest when students perceived either (a) high advisory working alliance and low research team cohesion or (b) low advisory working alliance and high research team cohesion. Training implications and future directions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1459发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
心海发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
KAI完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
王大菜完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
实验好难应助无奈抽屉采纳,获得10
3秒前
无私水卉发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
任我行发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
rorolinlin完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
萍子发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
缓慢夜阑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
XL发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
罗健完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
夏xia发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
大个应助tough采纳,获得30
6秒前
7秒前
幽默尔蓝发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
元谷雪发布了新的文献求助200
8秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助LDDD采纳,获得10
8秒前
zwxzwx发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
caohuijun完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Hezam完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
科研通AI5应助岳苏佳采纳,获得10
10秒前
彭于彦祖应助无私水卉采纳,获得20
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
SYLH应助你怎么睡得着觉采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
小羊咩咩发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
Cheryy发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 104th edition 1000
Density Functional Theory: A Practical Introduction, 2nd Edition 840
J'AI COMBATTU POUR MAO // ANNA WANG 660
Izeltabart tapatansine - AdisInsight 600
Gay and Lesbian Asia 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3756055
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3299291
关于积分的说明 10109581
捐赠科研通 3013845
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1655326
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 789704
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 753361