医学
QRS波群
心脏病学
左束支阻滞
内科学
捆绑
心力衰竭
复合材料
材料科学
作者
Miaomiao Li,Changqing Li,Jia Li,Haibo Yu,Guoqing Xu,Yang Gao,Baige Xu,Mingyu Sun,Zulu Wang,Yaling Han,Yanchun Liang
出处
期刊:Heart Rhythm
[Elsevier]
日期:2024-03-01
卷期号:21 (3): 294-300
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.003
摘要
Background Left bundle branch (LBB) pacing (LBBP) is a physiological pacing; however, the accuracy of current electrocardiographic criteria for LBBP remains inadequate. Objective The purpose of this study was to establish a novel individualized criterion to improve the accuracy of LBBP determination in patients with a narrow QRS complex. Methods Patients in whom both LBBP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) were acquired during operation were enrolled. LBB conduction time (LBBCT) was measured from LBB potential (LBBpo) to intrinsic QRS onset. LBBpo-V6RWPT, Native-V6RWPT, and Paced-V6RWPT were respectively measured from LBBpo, intrinsic QRS onset, and stimulus to R-wave peak in V6. ΔV6RWPT was the difference value between Paced-V6RWPT and Native-V6RWPT. The accuracy of ΔV6RWPT criterion for determining LBBP was evaluated. Results In all 71 enrolled patients, ΔV6RWPT was <30 ms during LBBP (21.3 ± 4.6 ms; range 9.3–28.3 ms) but was >30 ms during LVSP (38.5 ± 4.6 ms; range 31.1–47.0 ms). The probability distribution of ΔV6RWPT was well separated between LBBP and LVSP. Sensitivity and specificity of the novel criterion of "ΔV6RWPT <30 ms" for determining LBBP both were 100%. However, the optimal cutoff value of Paced-V6RWPT for validation of LBBP was 64.2 ms, and sensitivity and specificity were 84.5% and 97.2%, respectively. Paced-V6RWPT during LBBP was equivalent to LBBpo-V6RWPT in all patients. There was a strong linear correlation between Native-V6RWPT and LBBpo-V6RWPT (r = 0.796; P <.001). Conclusion ΔV6RWPT could be an accurate individualized criterion for determining LBB capture with high sensitivity and specificity and was superior over the fixed Paced-V6RWPT criterion.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI