医学
婴儿绞痛
罗伊乳杆菌
哭
随机对照试验
荟萃分析
益生菌
动物双歧杆菌
安慰剂
双歧杆菌
儿科
科克伦图书馆
初乳
益生元
婴儿配方奶粉
内科学
双歧杆菌
乳酸菌
食品科学
替代医学
免疫学
精神科
细菌
化学
病理
发酵
抗体
生物
遗传学
作者
Sáskia Ribeiro Vaz,Marise Helena Cardoso Tofoli,Melissa Ameloti Gomes Avelino,Paulo Sucasas Costa
摘要
Abstract Aim This study is a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials that employed probiotics and symbiotics for treating infantile colic. Methods We performed electronic systematic literature searches in Embase, PubMed and Web of Science, to identify articles published between 1950 and April 2023. Only RCT involving infants with infantile colic under 3 months were included. The treatment plan comprised 15 probiotics, which included Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and Bifidobacterium animalis lactis BB‐12 . The probiotics were administered alone or in combination with a prebiotic, vs. no intervention or a placebo. Results Probiotics resulted in an average reduction of 51 min of crying per day ( p = 0.001). Further analysis of subgroups showed that the reduction was −39.30 min for vaginal delivery ( p = 0.003), −64.66 min for Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 ( p = 0.03), −40.45 min for other strains ( p < 0.00001), −74.28 min for exclusively breastfed infants ( p = 0.0003) and −48.04 min for mixed feeding ( p < 0.00001). Conclusion All probiotic strains seem effective in treating infantile colic. Exclusively breastfed infants have demonstrated more significant reduction in crying time. However, the available evidence on the effectiveness of probiotics in formula‐fed and caesarean‐born infants is limited.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI