Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults

Vertical facial morphology has traditionally been studied by examining subjects chosen because of open bite/overbite or mandibular plane angle. The underlying skeletal and dental morphology associated with clinical facial appearance of normal and vertically dysplastic children and adults has not been well documented. The purposes of this study were to (1) describe vertical facial morphology in long-, normal-, and short-faced children and long-faced and normal adults, and (2) identify morphologic factors associated with the clinical evaluation of long-faced and normal subjects. Forty-two children, 6 to 12 years old, and forty-two young adults with varied vertical facial types were examined clinically and separated into three vertical classifications: long, normal, or short face. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained in natural head position and seven angular, eighteen linear, and six ratio measurements were made. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize all groups, and intergroup differences were compared using analysis of variance for the three child groups and the t test for the two adult groups. For both long-faced children and adults, anterior total face height, mandibular plane angle, gonial angle, and mandibulopalatal plane angle were significantly greater than normal. Ramus height was not significantly different from normal in the children, but there was a tendency for long-faced adults to have short rami. Excessive dentoalveolar development was evident in long-faced children but not in adults. Factors associated with the clinical identification of vertical dysplastic subjects were identified by a principal component analysis. For each component, a variable highly correlated with that component was selected. These variables were then included in a stepwise discriminant analysis. The analysis selected three variables—SN/mandibular plane angle, anterior total face height, and the ratio of anterior upper to anterior total face height. Although related, multiple morphologic factors were most helpful in explaining the clinical vertical evaluation of facial patterns.