医学
接收机工作特性
曲线下面积
前列腺癌
预测值
回顾性队列研究
核医学
曲线下面积
磁共振成像
试验预测值
放射科
活检
正谓词值
内科学
癌症
药代动力学
作者
Shikuan Guo,Fei Kang,Shuaijun Ma,Jianhua Jiao,Jing Ren,Jing Wang,Jingliang Zhang,Weijun Qin
出处
期刊:Clinical Nuclear Medicine
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-11-29
卷期号:49 (1): 37-44
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/rlu.0000000000004951
摘要
Purpose Multiparametric MRI is the current standard for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, men with negative or equivocal MRI often undergo unnecessary biopsies due to concerns about false-negative results. The recently proposed 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based PRIMARY score exhibited good diagnostic performance for csPCa. This study aimed to externally validate the performance of the PRIMARY score and evaluate its added diagnostic value to MRI triage in detecting csPCa. Patients and Methods This retrospective cohort study included 431 men who underwent both 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI before biopsy. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the decision curve analysis. The PRIMARY score + MRI was considered positive for either PRIMARY score 3–5 or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4/5. Results The prevalence of csPCa was 51.7% (223/431). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the 5-level PRIMARY score for csPCa was significantly higher than that of MRI (0.873 vs 0.786, P < 0.001). For the entire group, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the PRIMARY score were 90.6%, 61.1%, 71.4%, and 85.8%, respectively, which outperformed 87.9%, 49.0%, 64.9%, and 79.1% of PI-RADS on MRI. The PRIAMRY score + MRI improved sensitivity (96.0% vs 87.9%, P < 0.001) and negative predictive value (91.5% vs 79.1%, P < 0.001) without compromising specificity and positive predictive value compared with MRI alone. This combined approach avoided 24.6% (106/431) of unnecessary biopsies, while missing 4.0% (9/223) of csPCa cases. The addition of the PRIMARY score in men with PI-RADS 1–3 showed a net benefit, but not in men with PI-RADS 4/5. Conclusions The PRIMARY score was superior to MRI in detecting csPCa, and its added diagnostic value was in men with negative or equivocal MRI results. The PRIMARY score + MRI improved negative predictive value and sensitivity for csPCa compared with MRI alone. Further prospective trials will validate whether men with clinical suspicion of csPCa but negative PRIMARY score + MRI can safely avoid unnecessary biopsies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI