情景记忆
大脑活动与冥想
心理学
情感(语言学)
疾病
神经科学
认知
阿尔茨海默病
认知功能衰退
默认模式网络
自传体记忆
痴呆
医学
脑电图
内科学
沟通
作者
Ian M. McDonough,Sara B. Festini,Meagan M. Wood
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.arr.2020.101133
摘要
• Do separate risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affect similar brain regions? • We reviewed task-evoked fMRI studies of episodic memory in AD risk groups. • AD risks were associated with non-localized, widespread brain activity alterations. • The AD risk patterns were characterized by both greater and lower brain activity. • Mixed fMRI findings do not indicate clear use as diagnostic tool. Many risk factors have been identified that predict future progression to Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, clear links have yet to be made between these risk factors and how they affect brain functioning in early stages of AD. We conducted a narrative review and a quantitative analysis to better understand the relationship between nine categories of AD risk (i.e., brain pathology, genetics/family history, vascular health, head trauma, cognitive decline, engagement in daily life, late-life depression, sex/gender, and ethnoracial group) and task-evoked fMRI activity during episodic memory in cognitively-normal older adults. Our narrative review revealed widespread regional alterations of both greater and lower brain activity with AD risk. Nevertheless, our quantitative analysis revealed that a subset of studies converged on two patterns: AD risk was associated with (1) greater brain activity in frontal and parietal regions, but (2) reduced brain activity in hippocampal and occipital regions. The brain regions affected depended on the assessed memory stage (encoding or retrieval). Although the results clearly indicate that AD risks impact brain activity, we caution against using fMRI as a diagnostic tool for AD at the current time because the above consistencies were present among much variability, even among the same risk factor.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI