因果推理
观察研究
推论
因果模型
预测推理
因果结构
因果关系(物理学)
计算机科学
机器学习
计量经济学
生态学
人工智能
心理学
频数推理
贝叶斯推理
统计
数学
生物
贝叶斯概率
物理
量子力学
作者
Suchinta Arif,M. Aaron MacNeil
摘要
Ecologists often rely on observational data to understand causal relationships. Although observational causal inference methodologies exist, predictive techniques such as model selection based on information criterion (e.g. AIC) remains a common approach used to understand ecological relationships. However, predictive approaches are not appropriate for drawing causal conclusions. Here, we highlight the distinction between predictive and causal inference and show how predictive techniques can lead to biased causal estimates. Instead, we encourage ecologists to valid causal inference methods such as the backdoor criterion, a graphical rule that can be used to determine causal relationships across observational studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI