甲基化DNA免疫沉淀
DNA甲基化
亚硫酸氢盐测序
照明菌甲基化试验
差异甲基化区
CpG站点
基因组
计算生物学
DNA测序
生物
表观遗传学
DNA
遗传学
基因
基因表达
作者
Ning Li,Mingzhi Ye,Yingrui Li,Zhixiang Yan,Lee M. Butcher,Jihua Sun,Xu Han,Quan Chen,Xiuqing zhang,Jun Wang
出处
期刊:Methods
[Elsevier]
日期:2010-04-28
卷期号:52 (3): 203-212
被引量:186
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.04.009
摘要
There are numerous approaches to decipher a whole genome DNA methylation profile (“methylome”), each varying in cost, throughput and resolution. The gold standard of these methods, whole genome bisulfite-sequencing (BS-seq), involves treatment of DNA with sodium bisulfite combined with subsequent high throughput sequencing. Using BS-seq, we generated a single-base-resolution methylome in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (in press). This BS-seq map was then used as the reference methylome to compare two alternative sequencing-based methylome assays (performed on the same donor of PBMCs): methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP-seq) and methyl-binding protein (MBD-seq). In our analysis, we found that MeDIP-seq and MBD-seq are complementary strategies, with MeDIP-seq more sensitive to highly methylated, high-CpG densities and MDB-seq more sensitive to highly methylated, moderate-CpG densities. Taking into account the size of a mammalian genome and the current expense of sequencing, we feel 3 gigabases (Gbp) 45 bp paired-end MeDIP-seq or MBD-seq uniquely mapped reads is the minimum requirement and cost-effective strategy for methylome pattern analysis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI