A comparative review of methane policies of the United States and China in the context of US – China climate cooperation

中国 背景(考古学) 气候政策 自然资源经济学 气候变化 国际贸易 政治学 经济 地理 生态学 生物 考古 法学
作者
Mengye Zhu,Steven J. Smith,Minpeng Chen,Meredydd Evans,Qimin Chai,Fei Teng,Pu Wang,Xinzhao Cheng,Wenli Li,Jenna Behrendt,Sha Yu,Sha Fu,Haiwen Zhang,Ryna Cui,Jiehong Lou,Manjyot Ahluwalia,Nathan Hultman,Yi Wang
出处
期刊:Climate Policy [Informa]
卷期号:: 1-19 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1080/14693062.2024.2366902
摘要

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. The US and China are the world's two of the largest methane emitters and jointly committed to tackling this global challenge in the US–China Joint Glasgow Declaration at COP26 in 2021. However, few studies have revealed the methane policy landscape in the two countries. Greater understanding of these policies and how they have evolved is critical for enhancing future actions. We addressed important research topics currently understudied, including the types of policy instruments used, the commonalities and differences between the two countries in their primary policy foci, and the evolution and driving forces of methane policies. This study conducted a comprehensive and comparative review of methane-related governance structures and policy frameworks in both countries. We performed policy mapping based on systematic and large-scale policy document collection and screening, followed by an in-depth review of the development of methane policies in both countries. This study found that both countries placed uneven emphases across sectors, with a notable focus on the energy sector. While the US showed a preference for regulatory policy instruments such as acts, rules and regulations, China primarily utilized planning instruments such as Five-Year Plans (FYPs), notices, and working guidelines. Additionally, methane policies in both countries were largely driven by safety, resource utilization, and pollution concerns rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our study suggests that both countries should fill the policy gaps to accelerate their actions on methane mitigation and consider more climate-centric policies. It underlines the potential for US–China collaboration through the exchange of knowledge and best practices, which would also greatly advance global climate governance.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
乐乐应助大方安白采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
星睿发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
毛毛虫发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助洞两采纳,获得10
3秒前
jusser完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
科研通AI5应助喜洋羊采纳,获得10
5秒前
Dani完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
小鲤鱼在睡觉完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
任性青烟完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
ledo发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
上官若男应助111采纳,获得10
7秒前
aaaa完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
FBI汪宁完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
mengtian完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Xiaoyuan完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
wss发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
阿吉泰发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
11秒前
自觉士萧发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
黑森林发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
hmxh发布了新的文献求助20
12秒前
钱多多完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
所幸完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
番薯完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
15秒前
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
勤恳逍遥发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
好大一个赣宝完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
无限的路人完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
SciGPT应助ZHANG_Kun采纳,获得10
18秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 710
電気学会論文誌D(産業応用部門誌), 141 巻, 11 号 510
Virulence Mechanisms of Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3564065
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3137276
关于积分的说明 9421653
捐赠科研通 2837658
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1559942
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 729224
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 717215