Clinical features and outcomes of asymptomatic pulmonary sarcoidosis. A comparative cohort study

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with asymptomatic pulmonary sarcoidosis (APS) detected incidentally and compare them with symptomatic non-Löfgren sarcoidosis (SnLS) patients.

Methods

Patients diagnosed as having APS at a University hospital in Barcelona, Spain, followed prospectively from 1976 to 2018. APS was defined as the presence of bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL) with or without lung parenchymal involvement discovered incidentally on chest radiograph or CT scan. APS was compared with SnLS.

Results

APS was diagnosed in 50 (13.6%) and SnLS in 317 (86.4%) patients. At diagnosis, stage I chest radiograph was significantly more frequent in APS than in SnLS (p < 0.001) and there were no asymptomatic patients with stages III and IV. SnLS showed more severe impairment in FVC (p = 0.009) and forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) (p = 0.003) than APS, while DLco was similar in both groups. Extrathoracic involvement at diagnosis and during the follow up was less frequent in APS than in SnLS patients (p < 0.005). Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS) was the most used diagnostic tool. Treatment was more frequently required in the SnLS than in APS (p < 0.001). At five years, APS patients showed less presence of active disease than SnLS (p = 0.054).

Conclusions

APS showed earlier radiological stages, lesser impairment in lung function, extrapulmonary organ involvement and need for treatment than SnLS. EBUS was the most useful diagnostic tool. In spite of its benign presentation, around one third of patients evolved to persistent disease but usually with mild clinical and functional impairment.