Analysis of national real-world data on reoperations after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Aims The aim of this study was to examine the indications for further surgery and the characteristics of the patients within one year of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA), providing an assessment of everyday clinical practice and outcomes in a high-volume country. Methods All mUKAs which were performed between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2021 and underwent further surgery within one year, from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry (DKAR), were included. For primary procedures and reoperations, we received data on the characteristics of the patients, the indications for surgery, the type of procedure, and the sizes of the components individually, from each Danish private and public arthroplasty centre. All subsequent reoperations were recorded regardless of the time since the initial procedure. Results A total of 2,431 primary mUKAs in 2,303 patients were reported to the DKAR during the study period and 55 patients (55 mUKAs; 2.3%; (95% CI 1.7 to 3.0)) underwent further surgery within one year. The most frequent indications for reoperation were periprosthetic fracture (n = 16; 0.7% (95% CI 0.4 to 1.1)), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 13; 0.5% (95% CI 0.3 to 0.9)), and bearing dislocation (n = 9; 0.4% (95% CI 0.2 to 0.7)). Six periprosthetic fractures were treated with internal fixation, but five of these patients later underwent revision to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Ten PJIs were treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Due to persistent infection, four of these patients later underwent revision to a TKA. All nine bearing dislocations were treated with exchange of the liner, and seven occurred in patients who, based on their sex and height, probably had undersized femoral components. Conclusion Reoperations are rare following mUKA in a high-volume country. The most frequent indications for further surgery were periprosthetic fracture, PJI, and bearing dislocation. Using internal fixation to treat periprosthetic fractures after mUKA gives poor results. Whether DAIR is an appropriate form of treatment for PJI in mUKAs, and how to ensure the effective eradication of infection in these patients, remains uncertain. Undersizing the femoral component might increase the risk of bearing dislocation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(3):314–321.