文档
过程(计算)
相(物质)
过程管理
研究设计
项目管理
计算机科学
知识管理
运营管理
管理科学
业务
工程类
社会学
系统工程
有机化学
化学
操作系统
程序设计语言
社会科学
作者
Rouzbeh Shabani,T Malvik,Agnar Johansen,Olav Torp
出处
期刊:International Journal of Managing Projects in Business
[Emerald (MCB UP)]
日期:2022-12-23
卷期号:16 (8): 27-57
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1108/ijmpb-02-2022-0050
摘要
Purpose Uncertainty management (UM) in projects has been a point of attention for researchers for many years. Research on UM has mainly been aimed at uncertainty analyses in the front-end and managing uncertainty in the construction phase. In contrast, UM components in the design phase have received less attention. This research aims to improve knowledge about the key components of UM in the design phase of large road projects. Design/methodology/approach This study adopted a literature review and case study. The literature review was used to identify relevant criteria for UM. These criteria helped to design the interview guide. Multiple case study research was conducted, and data were collected through document study and interviews with project stakeholders in two road projects. Each case's owners, contractors and consultants were interviewed individually. Findings The data analysis obtained helpful information on the involved parties, process and exploit tools and techniques during the design phase. Johansen's (2015) framework [(a) human and organisation, (b) process and (c) tools and techniques)] was completed and developed by identifying relevant criteria (such as risk averse or risk-taker, culture and documentation level) for each component. These criteria help to measure UM performance. The authors found that owners and contractors are major formal UM actors, not consultants. Empirical data showed the effectiveness of Web-based tools in UM. Research limitations/implications The studied cases were Norwegian, and this study focussed on uncertainties in the project's design phase. Relevant criteria did not cover all the criteria for evaluating the performance of UM. Qualitative evaluation of criteria allows further quantitative analysis in the future. Practical implications This paper gave project owners and managers a better understanding of relevant criteria for measuring UM in the owners and managers' projects. The paper provides policy-makers with a deeper understanding of creating rigorous project criteria for UM during the design phase. This paper also provides a guideline for UM in road projects. Originality/value This research gives a holistic evaluation of UM by noticing relevant criteria and criteria's interconnection in the design phase.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI