医学
感染性休克
重症监护室
中心静脉压
临床终点
急诊医学
重症监护医学
去甲肾上腺素
休克(循环)
危险系数
重症监护
血压
麻醉
临床试验
败血症
内科学
心率
置信区间
多巴胺
作者
Paolo Bima,Carmen Orlotti,Okot Godfrey Smart,Fulvio Morello,Mattia Trunfio,Luca Brazzi,Giorgia Montrucchio
标识
DOI:10.1080/20477724.2022.2038051
摘要
Septic shock treatment in sub-Saharan African hospitals is challenging due to limited availability of ICUs, central venous catheters, vasopressors, and trained staff. We designed this proof-of-concept study to determine efficacy, safety, and feasibility of norepinephrine (NE) use in a non-intensive setting in a low-resource country, consisting in a peripheral infusion via a mechanical drop counter. Septic shock patients accessing a rural hospital in Uganda were included: the 2020 group (N = 12) was prospectively enrolled (Jan–Mar 2020) when NE was available; the 2019 group (N = 11) was retrospectively enrolled (Oct–Dec 2019). Enrollment was continuous to reduce selection bias. Basic clinical endpoints (noninvasive blood pressure, tissue perfusion, diuresis) defined shock control and the prognostic endpoint was survival at hospital discharge. Shock control at 6 and 12 hours was higher in the 2020 group (p = 0.012 for both). Survival at hospital discharge was 75% and 27.3%, respectively (p = 0.039). NE infusion was associated with a Hazard Ratio of 0.23 (p = 0.041) in a multivariate Cox model. No NE-induced adverse effects were detected. These preliminary results suggest that implementing NE infusion in a low-resource setting without ICU could be a safe and effective strategy in managing septic shock and that this approach could lead to a lower mortality rate.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI