Cognitive Outcomes in Nonacute Patients With Schizophrenia Treated With Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics Versus Oral Antipsychotics

医学 精神分裂症(面向对象编程) 奥氮平 氯氮平 认知 精神科 抗精神病药 利培酮 内科学 儿科
作者
Paula Simina Petric,Andreea Teodorescu,Ana Aliana Miron,Mihnea Costin Manea,Petru Ifteni
出处
期刊:American Journal of Therapeutics 卷期号:31 (3): e219-e228 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1097/mjt.0000000000001729
摘要

Background: Patients with schizophrenia often face challenges related to cognitive function, affecting their daily functioning and overall quality of life. The choice of antipsychotic treatment may play a crucial role in determining cognitive outcomes. Study Question: Our study aimed to investigate whether there was a difference in cognitive ability between the patients with schizophrenia receiving oral antipsychotics (OAP) versus long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs). Study Design: We conducted a cross-sectional study using analytical methods between January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2022. Participants were divided into 2 groups: patients undergoing treatment with OAP and patients undergoing treatment with LAI-AP. All participants underwent version A of Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Measures and Outcomes: The primary objective was to compare cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia treated with LAI antipsychotics versus OAP using BACS. Primary outcome measures include overall BACS score, with secondary measures focusing on specific cognitive domains. This study contributes to the understanding of the cognitive effects of different antipsychotic formulations in schizophrenia treatment. Results: Although there was a slightly higher intelligence quotient in the LAI-AP group (102.2 vs. 101.32, P = 0.5401), it was not statistically significant. Olanzapine was the most commonly prescribed antipsychotic, with 48% of patients in the LAI-AP group and 40% in the OAP group. The LAI-AP group outperformed in all BACS evaluations. The most notable difference was in the token motor task (57.78 ± 17.03 vs. 50.04 ± 18.82, P = 0.0335), while the Tower of London test showed the smallest difference (17.26 ± 2.61 vs. 15.48 ± 3.47, P = 0.0046). Regression analysis revealed no significant variance in intelligence quotient scores; however, a significant discrepancy in BACS scores was evident, favoring the LAI treatment for better cognitive outcomes. Conclusions: The use of long-acting antipsychotic treatment in individuals with schizophrenia offers promising advantages in preserving cognitive function.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
aike发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
苹果煎饼发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Anan发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
研友_X89o6n发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
chanyi发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
笨逗逗完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
科研通AI2S应助吴彦祖采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
9209发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
7秒前
Dou_Xiaowen发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
9秒前
QiJiLuLu发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
远_09完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
笨逗逗发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
传统的斓完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
勤恳发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
SciGPT应助srf0602.采纳,获得10
13秒前
Survivor应助感动白开水采纳,获得10
15秒前
15秒前
chanyi完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
yk32315发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
七月流火应助陈12采纳,获得80
16秒前
修狗2完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
菜懂菜菜发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
高无怨发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
gyhmm发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
单纯的猫咪完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
20秒前
srf0602.发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
卜卜脆完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
SigRosa完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
man应助刘继海采纳,获得10
21秒前
俊逸的慕儿完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
无花果应助xiaosi采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
伍英发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
高分求助中
The late Devonian Standard Conodont Zonation 2000
The Lali Section: An Excellent Reference Section for Upper - Devonian in South China 1500
Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination (3rd Ed. 2024) 1200
Nickel superalloy market size, share, growth, trends, and forecast 2023-2030 1000
Smart but Scattered: The Revolutionary Executive Skills Approach to Helping Kids Reach Their Potential (第二版) 1000
Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3244242
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2887961
关于积分的说明 8250736
捐赠科研通 2556491
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1384786
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 649936
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 626021