Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial

医学 持续气道正压 机械通风 气道 麻醉 随机对照试验 通风(建筑) 呼吸衰竭 儿科 外科 工程类 机械工程 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停
作者
Anna Madeline Kidman,Brett J. Manley,Rosemarie A. Boland,Anil K. Malhotra,Susan Donath,Friederike Beker,Peter G. Davis,Risha Bhatia
出处
期刊:The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health [Elsevier]
卷期号:7 (12): 844-851 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00235-3
摘要

Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation.In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224.Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema.Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety.National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
灵儿完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
Fan完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
西门子云发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
chriselva应助牛诗悦采纳,获得10
3秒前
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
刚刚好完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
情怀应助feilei采纳,获得10
6秒前
Dd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
852应助CRane采纳,获得10
8秒前
桐桐应助虚心碧采纳,获得10
8秒前
甜蜜向梦发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
qwe完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
pattrick发布了新的文献求助20
9秒前
10秒前
XX发布了新的文献求助30
10秒前
文静梦菡发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
冷傲的嵩发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
在水一方应助zhaiyi采纳,获得10
11秒前
mr.pork发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
bkagyin应助wxhy采纳,获得10
16秒前
妩媚的强炫完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
娜娜完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
21秒前
brave heart完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
共享精神应助叶世玉采纳,获得10
24秒前
西门子云完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
酷波er应助ZSM911采纳,获得10
24秒前
坚定幻嫣完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
ding应助LG采纳,获得10
29秒前
Ring完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
冷傲的嵩完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
Ava应助111采纳,获得10
32秒前
33秒前
自由的蛋挞完成签到,获得积分20
34秒前
35秒前
高分求助中
Lire en communiste 1000
Ore genesis in the Zambian Copperbelt with particular reference to the northern sector of the Chambishi basin 800
Becoming: An Introduction to Jung's Concept of Individuation 600
中国氢能技术发展路线图研究 500
Communist propaganda: a fact book, 1957-1958 500
Briefe aus Shanghai 1946‒1952 (Dokumente eines Kulturschocks) 500
A new species of Coccus (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from Malawi 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3168354
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2819697
关于积分的说明 7927596
捐赠科研通 2479609
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1321007
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 632925
版权声明 602460