Task-based learning versus problem-oriented lecture in neurology continuing medical education.

克朗巴赫阿尔法 考试(生物学) 继续医学教育 基于问题的学习 多项选择 显著性差异 心理学 任务(项目管理) 医学 医学教育 继续教育 临床心理学 心理测量学 内科学 古生物学 经济 管理 生物
作者
Farhan Vakani,Wasim Jafri,Amina Ahmad,Aziz Sonawalla,Mughis Sheerani
出处
期刊:PubMed 卷期号:24 (1): 23-6 被引量:15
链接
标识
摘要

To determine whether general practitioners learned better with task-based learning or problem-oriented lecture in a Continuing Medical Education (CME) set-up.Quasi-experimental study.The Aga Khan University, Karachi campus, from April to June 2012.Fifty-nine physicians were given a choice to opt for either Task-based Learning (TBL) or Problem Oriented Lecture (PBL) in a continuing medical education set-up about headaches. The TBL group had 30 participants divided into 10 small groups, and were assigned case-based tasks. The lecture group had 29 participants. Both groups were given a pre and a post-test. Pre/post assessment was done using one-best MCQs. The reliability coefficient of scores for both the groups was estimated through Cronbach's alpha. An item analysis for difficulty and discriminatory indices was calculated for both the groups. Paired t-test was used to determine the difference between pre- and post-test scores of both groups. Independent t-test was used to compare the impact of the two teaching methods in terms of learning through scores produced by MCQ test.Cronbach's alpha was 0.672 for the lecture group and 0.881 for TBL group. Item analysis for difficulty (p) and discriminatory indexes (d) was obtained for both groups. The results for the lecture group showed pre-test (p) = 42% vs. post-test (p) = 43%; pre- test (d) = 0.60 vs. post-test (d) = 0.40. The TBL group showed pre -test (p) = 48% vs. post-test (p) = 70%; pre-test (d) = 0.69 vs. post-test (d) = 0.73. Lecture group pre-/post-test mean scores were (8.52 ± 2.95 vs. 12.41 ± 2.65; p < 0.001), where TBL group showed (9.70 ± 3.65 vs. 14 ± 3.99; p < 0.001). Independent t-test exhibited an insignificant difference at baseline (lecture 8.52 ± 2.95 vs. TBL 9.70 ± 3.65; p = 0.177). The post-scores were not statistically different lecture 12.41 ± 2.65 vs. TBL 14 ± 3.99; p = 0.07).Both delivery methods were found to be equally effective, showing statistically insignificant differences. However, TBL groups' post-test higher mean scores and radical increase in the post-test difficulty index demonstrated improved learning through TBL delivery and calls for further exploration of longitudinal studies in the context of CME.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
elias发布了新的文献求助30
刚刚
RONG完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
打打应助Zzz采纳,获得10
1秒前
是否跨凤乘龙完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
wanci应助萤火虫采纳,获得10
3秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助RONG采纳,获得10
3秒前
wmm完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
哈哈哈哈哈哈完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
TWEETY发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
稳如老狗完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ytx发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
李爱国应助happyboy2008采纳,获得10
7秒前
香蕉觅云应助lin林希采纳,获得10
7秒前
白啊啊啊啊啊完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
深情安青应助wishe采纳,获得10
7秒前
Mzo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
SciGPT应助ahtj采纳,获得10
8秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助11采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Alex发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
动漫大师发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
yyzhou完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
华仔应助chenggong采纳,获得10
11秒前
彭于晏应助Mzo采纳,获得10
12秒前
PPRer完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Herman_Chen完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
omyga关注了科研通微信公众号
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
wanci应助热心的银耳汤采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
LinXin完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
louis dai发布了新的文献求助200
16秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
Resilience of a Nation: A History of the Military in Rwanda 888
Crystal Nonlinear Optics: with SNLO examples (Second Edition) 500
Measure Mean Linear Intercept 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3731340
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3275733
关于积分的说明 9993439
捐赠科研通 2991258
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1641460
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 779824
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 748449