埃尔特罗姆博帕格
罗米普洛斯蒂姆
中止
医学
不利影响
四分位间距
内科学
免疫性血小板减少症
血小板生成素
血小板生成素受体
队列
血小板
遗传学
干细胞
造血
生物
作者
José Ramón González‐Porras,María Eva Mingot‐Castellano,Marcio Andrade,Rafael Alonso,Isabel Caparrós,María Carmen Arratibel,Fernando Fernández‐Fuertes,María José Cortti,Cristina Pascual,Blanca Sánchez‐González,Silvia Bernat,Miguel Angel Fuertes‐Palacio,Juan Andrés Vázquez‐Paganini,Pável Olivera,María Román,Isidro Jarque,Montserrat Cortés,Violeta Martínez‐Robles,Francisco Javier Díaz‐Gálvez,María Calbacho
摘要
Summary The thrombopoietin receptor agonists ( THPO ‐ RA s), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are effective and safe in immune thrombocytopenia ( ITP ). However, the value of their sequential use when no response is achieved or when adverse events occur with one THPO ‐ RA has not been clearly established. Here we retrospectively evaluated 51 primary ITP adult patients treated with romiplostim followed by eltrombopag. The median age of our cohort was 49 (range, 18–83) years. There were 32 women and 19 men. The median duration of romiplostim use before switching to eltrombopag was 12 (interquartile range 5–21) months. The reasons for switching were: lack of efficacy ( n = 25), patient preference ( n = 16), platelet‐count fluctuation ( n = 6) and side‐effects ( n = 4). The response rate to eltrombopag was 80% (41/51), including 67% ( n = 35) complete responses. After a median follow‐up of 14 months, 31 patients maintained their response. Efficacy was maintained after switching in all patients in the patient preference, platelet‐count fluctuation and side‐effect groups. 33% of patients experienced one or more adverse events during treatment with eltrombopag. We consider the use of eltrombopag after romiplostim for treating ITP to be effective and safe. Response to eltrombopag was related to the cause of romiplostim discontinuation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI