已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

High-sensitivity troponin assays for early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction in people with acute chest pain: a systematic review and economic evaluation

医学 心肌梗塞 胸痛 肌钙蛋白 急诊科 内科学 心肌梗死诊断 逻辑回归 急诊医学 重症监护医学 心脏病学 精神科
作者
Marie Westwood,Bram Ramaekers,Sabine Grimm,Gill Worthy,Debra Fayter,Nigel Armstrong,Titas Buksnys,Janine Ross,Manuela Joore,Jos Kleijnen
出处
期刊:Health Technology Assessment [National Institute for Health Research]
卷期号:25 (33): 1-276 被引量:54
标识
DOI:10.3310/hta25330
摘要

Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction is important, but only 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an acute myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays may allow rapid rule out of myocardial infarction and avoid unnecessary hospital admissions.To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for the management of adults presenting with acute chest pain, in particular for the early rule-out of acute myocardial infarction.Sixteen databases were searched up to September 2019. Review methods followed published guidelines. Studies were assessed for quality using appropriate risk-of-bias tools. The bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity for meta-analyses involving four or more studies; otherwise, random-effects logistic regression was used. The health economic analysis considered the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life-years associated with different troponin testing methods. The de novo model consisted of a decision tree and a state-transition cohort model. A lifetime time horizon (of 60 years) was used.Thirty-seven studies (123 publications) were included in the review. The high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test strategies evaluated are defined by the combination of four factors (i.e. assay, number and timing of tests, and threshold concentration), resulting in a large number of possible combinations. Clinical opinion indicated a minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity of 97%. When considering single test strategies, only those using a threshold at or near to the limit of detection for the assay, in a sample taken at presentation, met the minimum clinically acceptable sensitivity criterion. The majority of the multiple test strategies that met this criterion comprised an initial rule-out step, based on high-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels in a sample taken on presentation and a minimum symptom duration, and a second stage for patients not meeting the initial rule-out criteria, based on presentation levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and absolute change after 1, 2 or 3 hours. Two large cluster randomised controlled trials found that implementation of an early rule-out pathway for myocardial infarction reduced length of stay and rate of hospital admission without increasing cardiac events. In the base-case analysis, standard troponin testing was both the most effective and the most costly. Other testing strategies with a sensitivity of 100% (subject to uncertainty) were almost equally effective, resulting in the same life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gain at up to four decimal places. Comparisons based on the next best alternative showed that for willingness-to-pay values below £8455 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Access High Sensitivity Troponin I (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) [(symptoms > 3 hours AND < 4 ng/l at 0 hours) OR (< 5 ng/l AND Δ < 5 ng/l at 0 to 2 hours)] would be cost-effective. For thresholds between £8455 and £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Elecsys® Troponin-T high sensitive (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) (< 12 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 3 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective. For a threshold > £20,190 per quality-adjusted life-year, the Dimension Vista® High-Sensitivity Troponin I (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) (< 5 ng/l at 0 hours AND Δ < 2 ng/l at 0 to 1 hours) would be cost-effective.High-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing may be cost-effective compared with standard troponin testing.This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019154716.This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 33. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.Heart disease is a leading cause of death in the UK, with myocardial infarction (heart attack) accounting for approximately 4% of all deaths recorded in 2018. Many people attend hospital with chest pain and suspected myocardial infarction, and chest pain has been reported as the most common cause of hospital admissions in the UK, accounting for approximately 5% of all emergency admissions in 2017–18. It is important to diagnose people who are suspected of having a myocardial infarction as early as possible to ensure quick and effective treatment. However, only around 20% of emergency admissions for chest pain will actually have an myocardial infarction and there are many other possible causes of chest pain (e.g. gastro-oesophageal disorders, muscle pain, anxiety or stable ischaemic heart disease). Current practice for ruling out myocardial infarction includes blood tests taken when the patient is first seen in the emergency department and repeated after 3–6 hours or 10–12 hours, depending on the test used. Tests that can quickly tell which patients do not have myocardial infarction could therefore avoid unnecessary hospital admissions and anxiety for many people. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of high-sensitivity troponin tests, used as single tests or repeated over a short time, for the early rule out of myocardial infarction in people who present to hospital with chest pain. We found that high-sensitivity troponin tests can safely rule out myocardial infarction within the 4-hour NHS emergency department target. Health economic analyses indicated that high-sensitivity tests may be considered value for money compared with standard troponin tests, which require repeat testing at 10–12 hours.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
领导范儿应助冬冬采纳,获得10
2秒前
佐小叶完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
112333发布了新的文献求助80
4秒前
大个应助友好大树采纳,获得30
5秒前
风中山河关注了科研通微信公众号
14秒前
optaw完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
高大白翠完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
钮祜禄萱完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
wuludie应助Lin采纳,获得10
28秒前
简单的思松完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
风中山河发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
lifuqiang发布了新的文献求助10
35秒前
乐乐应助简单的思松采纳,获得10
35秒前
yxm完成签到 ,获得积分10
38秒前
韩寒完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助屈灿采纳,获得10
46秒前
卷卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
CYing完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
zyj发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
wenwen完成签到,获得积分20
56秒前
57秒前
Boketto发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
情怀应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
wenwen发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
屈灿发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
orixero应助ALEX采纳,获得10
1分钟前
现代雅香发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
zyj完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
雪白康完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
Boketto完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
shl发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
August发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Structural Load Modelling and Combination for Performance and Safety Evaluation 800
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3555627
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3131330
关于积分的说明 9390563
捐赠科研通 2830968
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1556243
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 726475
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 715803