Staged Excision Technique to Reduce Scar Length

Patients and surgeons are often disappointed with the scar length after conventional staged excision of large disfiguring skin lesions. We have developed an alternative approach to facilitate scar length reduction. We aimed to report the efficacy of our staged excision method, which includes a hexagonal-pattern excision, wide undermining, and purse-string suture. Sixty-five patients, each with one lesion, were included in the current study. The lesion length and width were recorded, and the scar area was calculated at each stage. The final scar length after performing the altered staged excision method was compared with that obtained after the conventional staged excision method, which was calculated using a theoretical scar model. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. The mean longest axis length was 9.41 ± 3.83 cm preoperatively, 9.50 ± 3.92 cm after the first stage postoperatively, and 10.19 ± 3.98 cm after the final stage. The mean lesion width was 6.50 ± 3.48 cm preoperatively, 3.60 ± 1.77 cm after the first stage postoperatively, and 0.42 ± 0.31 cm after the final stage. The final scar length obtained using the altered procedure was much shorter than what would be obtained using conventional staged excision. The patient satisfaction score was 8.8 ± 1.1 out of a possible 10.0 rating. Staged excision with a hexagonal-pattern excision, wide undermining, and purse-string closure may improve aesthetic results. Patients and surgeons are often disappointed with the scar length after conventional staged excision of large disfiguring skin lesions. We have developed an alternative approach to facilitate scar length reduction. We aimed to report the efficacy of our staged excision method, which includes a hexagonal-pattern excision, wide undermining, and purse-string suture. Sixty-five patients, each with one lesion, were included in the current study. The lesion length and width were recorded, and the scar area was calculated at each stage. The final scar length after performing the altered staged excision method was compared with that obtained after the conventional staged excision method, which was calculated using a theoretical scar model. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. The mean longest axis length was 9.41 ± 3.83 cm preoperatively, 9.50 ± 3.92 cm after the first stage postoperatively, and 10.19 ± 3.98 cm after the final stage. The mean lesion width was 6.50 ± 3.48 cm preoperatively, 3.60 ± 1.77 cm after the first stage postoperatively, and 0.42 ± 0.31 cm after the final stage. The final scar length obtained using the altered procedure was much shorter than what would be obtained using conventional staged excision. The patient satisfaction score was 8.8 ± 1.1 out of a possible 10.0 rating. Staged excision with a hexagonal-pattern excision, wide undermining, and purse-string closure may improve aesthetic results.