排放交易
碳排放税
碳纤维
温室气体
经济
国际经济学
清洁技术
自然资源经济学
业务
国际贸易
计算机科学
复合数
法学
算法
生物
生态学
政治学
作者
You-hua Chen,Chan Wang,Pu‐yan Nie,Zirui Chen
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.esr.2020.100483
摘要
Both carbon tax and cap-and-trade systems are widely applied to reduce emission. This article compares the clean innovation effects of carbon tax with cap-and-trade systems by a static optimal model. Firstly, both cap-and-trade system and carbon tax stimulates clean innovation and reduce emission. Secondly, cap-and-trade system is more efficient to reduce emission and to promote clean innovation than carbon tax. Finally, firms undertake a loss under carbon tax, while the effects of cap-and-trade system on firms' profits are uncertain, which depends on the carbon cap. In summary, this article supports cap-and-trade system to cope with global climate change, but the regulator should choose the suitable emission cap and carbon trading price to guarantee the efficiency of cap-and-trade system. So, different purposes match with different carbon emission tax policies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI