领域
妥协
国际关系
本体论安全
前提
论证(复杂分析)
认识论
社会学
政治
国际关系理论
安全研究
政治哲学
批判理论
集体安全
国际政治经济学
主观性
社会科学
政治学
法学
哲学
化学
生物化学
标识
DOI:10.1057/s41268-017-0083-3
摘要
The central premise of ontological security theory is that states are ready to compromise their physical security and other important material gains in order to protect their ontological security. While the existing studies have primarily focused on how states defend or maintain their ontological security, little attention has been paid to critical situations that make states ontologically insecure in the first place. Drawing on the work of Anthony Giddens, I conceptualise critical situations in world politics as radical disjunctions that challenge the ability of collective actors to ‘go on’ by bringing into the realm of discursive consciousness four fundamental questions related to existence, finitude, relations and autobiography. The argument is illustrated in a case study of ontological insecurity produced in Serbia by the secession of Kosovo.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI