等级间信度
组内相关
可靠性(半导体)
心理学
应用心理学
长期护理
考试(生物学)
观察研究
内容有效性
心理测量学
医学
评定量表
临床心理学
精神科
发展心理学
功率(物理)
物理
古生物学
病理
量子力学
生物
作者
Susan Rodiek,Adeleh Nejati,Eric Bardenhagen,Chanam Lee,Giulio Senes
出处
期刊:Gerontologist
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2014-06-17
卷期号:56 (2): 222-233
被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1093/geront/gnu050
摘要
To describe the development and psychometric testing of the Seniors' Outdoor Survey (SOS), an instrument for evaluating how well the outdoor space in a long-term care setting supports the preferences and outdoor usage of residents.Content validity of the main SOS items initially was based on relevant literature and preliminary studies in diverse long-term care settings. After conducting a multiregional pilot study with 152 outdoor spaces at 68 assisted living facilities, the instrument was substantially revised and tested for interrater and test-retest reliability with 22 outdoor spaces at 12 long-term care settings, using 2 raters. Validity was examined using content analysis of resident survey responses (N = 1,128) from the multiregional study and specific item validation by subject matter experts (N = 53).The final instrument contains 60 ratable items organized in 5 domains: access to nature (14 items), outdoor comfort and safety (15 items), walking and outdoor activities (14 items), indoor-outdoor connection (11 items), and connection to the world (6 items). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates of interrater reliability were .91 for the overall instrument, ranging from .83 to .98 for the 5 domains. Interrater reliability (ICC) was above .70 for more than 79% of individual items. Test-retest reliability (ICC) was .92, ranging from .81 to .98 for domains.The SOS tool fills a gap in the available environmental assessment instruments, providing a reliable way for researchers, providers, and designers to evaluate and compare the supportive potential of outdoor spaces for long-term care residents.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI