医学
荟萃分析
随机对照试验
奇纳
相对风险
心脏移植
置信区间
捐赠
移植
梅德林
内科学
重症监护医学
心理干预
法学
经济
精神科
经济增长
政治学
作者
Junjie Zong,Weicong Ye,Jizhang Yu,Xi Zhang,Jikai Cui,Zhang Chen,Yuan Li,Song Wang,Shuan Ran,Yuqing Niu,Zilong Luo,Xiaohan Li,Jiulu Zhao,Yanglin Hao,Jiahong Xia,Jie Wu
出处
期刊:Transplantation
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2024-04-05
卷期号:108 (9): e264-e275
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1097/tp.0000000000005017
摘要
Background. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation (HTx) significantly expands the donor pool and reduces waitlist mortality. However, high-level evidence-based data on its safety and effectiveness are lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes between DCD and donation after brain death (DBD) HTxs. Methods. Databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting the outcomes of DCD and DBD HTxs published from 2014 onward. The data were pooled using random-effects models. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as the summary measures for categorical outcomes and mean differences were used for continuous outcomes. Results. Twelve eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. DCD HTx was associated with lower 1-y mortality rate (DCD 8.13% versus DBD 10.24%; RR = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.96; P = 0.02) and 5-y mortality rate (DCD 14.61% versus DBD 20.57%; RR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97; P = 0.03) compared with DBD HTx. Conclusions. Using the current DCD criteria, HTx emerges as a promising alternative to DBD transplantation. The safety and feasibility of DCD hearts deserve further exploration and investigation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI