医学
全身麻醉
气管插管
镇静
围手术期
麻醉
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术
插管
重症监护医学
外科
胰腺炎
作者
Omid Azimaraghi,Mohammad Bilal,Somchai Amornyotin,Mustafa A. Arain,Matthias Behrends,Tyler M. Berzin,James Buxbaum,Curtis Choice,Philipp Faßbender,Mandeep Sawhney,Eswar Sundar,Karuna Wongtangman,Kate Leslie,Matthias Eikermann
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2023.03.012
摘要
Deep sedation without tracheal intubation (monitored anaesthesia care) and general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are commonly used anaesthesia techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There are distinct pathophysiological differences between monitored anaesthesia care and general anaesthesia that need to be considered depending on the nature and severity of the patient's underlying disease, comorbidities, and procedural risks. An international group of expert anaesthesiologists and gastroenterologists created clinically relevant questions regarding the merits and risks of monitored anaesthesia care vs general anaesthesia in specific clinical scenarios for planning optimal anaesthetic approaches for ERCP. Using a modified Delphi approach, the group created practical recommendations for anaesthesiologists, with the aim of reducing the incidence of perioperative adverse outcomes while maximising healthcare resource utilisation. In the majority of clinical scenarios analysed, our expert recommendations favour monitored anaesthesia care over general anaesthesia. Patients with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration and those undergoing prolonged procedures of high complexity were thought to benefit from general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. Patient age and ASA physical status were not considered to be factors for choosing between monitored anaesthesia care and general anaesthesia. Monitored anaesthesia care is the favoured anaesthesia plan for ERCP. An individual risk-benefit analysis that takes into account provider and institutional experience, patient comorbidities, and procedural risks is also needed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI