危害
生物多样性
生态系统
引进物种
乡土植物
功能(生物学)
生态系统服务
经验证据
入侵物种
生态学
环境资源管理
地理
生物
环境伦理学
环境规划
自然资源经济学
政治学
经济
法学
哲学
认识论
进化生物学
标识
DOI:10.1007/s10806-005-2851-0
摘要
Sagoff [Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (2005), 215–236] argues, against growing empirical evidence, that major environmental impacts of non-native species are unproven. However, many such impacts, including extinctions of both island and continental species, have both been demonstrated and judged by the public to be harmful. Although more public attention has been focused on non-native animals than non-native plants, the latter more often cause ecosystem-wide impacts. Increased regulation of introduction of non-native species is, therefore, warranted, and, contra Sagoff's assertions, invasion biologists have recently developed methods that greatly aid prediction of which introduced species will harm the environment and thus enable more efficient regulation. The fact that introduced species may increase local biodiversity in certain instances has not been shown to result in desired changes in ecosystem function. In other locales, they decrease biodiversity, as they do globally.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI