Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research

医学 样本量测定 医学物理学 统计 数学
作者
Peter Bacchetti,Jacqueline M. Leung
出处
期刊:Anesthesiology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:97 (4): 1028-1029 被引量:161
标识
DOI:10.1097/00000542-200210000-00050
摘要

To the Editor:—We write to make the case that the practice of providing a priori sample size calculations, recently endorsed in an Anesthesiology editorial, 1is in fact undesirable. Presentation of confidence intervals serves the same purpose, but is superior because it more accurately reflects the actual data, is simpler to present, addresses uncertainty more directly, and encourages more careful interpretation of results. The clinical trial report 2lauded in the editorial in fact serves to illustrate the drawbacks of sample size calculation as a data analysis tool. The a priori calculation presented is based on assumptions about length of stay (normally distributed with a SD of 4.5 days) that did not hold in the actual data, an analysis (comparison of mean length of stay between two groups by t test) that was not presented, and a sample size that was not attained. It therefore does not help the reader interpret the results, which is the proper goal when reporting on a study that has been completed. The post hoc power calculation presented retains most of these deficiencies, and therefore does not help the reader to assess the strength of evidence against a 1.0-day mean advantage for one treatment versus another. In contrast, a confidence interval for the difference in means would directly address this issue. Although the presence of outliers would require a bootstrapping method 3to obtain a valid confidence interval for a difference in means, this bit of extra effort is certainly worthwhile for the central issue of a study, and in any case, much better than relying on convoluted reasoning with invalid power approximations.Perhaps the worst aspect of reporting sample size or power calculations is that it encourages interpretation of studies' results based only on P values, in particular the widespread fallacy of interpreting P > 0.05 as proving the null hypothesis. The other article 4cited by the editorial provides a glaring example of this type of reasoning, concluding that reporting of sample size calculations did not change over time in any journal but did increase overall (see their fig. 2). Returning to the clinical trial report, consider the statement that death rates "were similar" in the four subgroups. While this is an accurate characterization of what was actually observed, unsophisticated readers are liable to interpret this (contrary to the authors' intentions) to mean that the study found strong evidence against any substantial difference in death rates. In fact, the exact 595% confidence interval around the odds ratio for death comparing intravenous versus epidural postoperative analgesia goes from 0.36 to 5.4, which is wide enough to make clear to most readers that this study by itself provides only very weak evidence against a clinically important difference in death rates.We urge reviewers, editors, and quality studies to give authors full credit for providing confidence intervals instead of sample size calculations in reports of completed studies. Indeed, for the reasons illustrated here, it would be best to discourage the practice of using sample size and power calculations as substitutes for more direct assessment of uncertainty using confidence intervals.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JMH完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
看文献了发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
linkin发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
AHA完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
YUMI发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
FashionBoy应助搞笑5次采纳,获得10
4秒前
犹豫安白完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
seven发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
11秒前
深情安青应助看文献了采纳,获得10
12秒前
瘦瘦妖妖完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
14秒前
15秒前
可乐不加冰完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助50
19秒前
爆米花应助zzp采纳,获得10
20秒前
芝士发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
六五发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22完成签到 ,获得积分20
21秒前
ZX801完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
白秋秋发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
完美世界应助huayi采纳,获得10
24秒前
24秒前
24秒前
25秒前
25秒前
SciGPT应助给大佬递茶采纳,获得30
25秒前
yxy303256651发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
溯风完成签到 ,获得积分0
27秒前
27秒前
哇哈哈发布了新的文献求助30
28秒前
包容剑鬼发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
ATOM完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
SciGPT应助七仔采纳,获得10
29秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 500
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3971732
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3516385
关于积分的说明 11182415
捐赠科研通 3251598
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1795960
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 876171
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 805340