普通合伙企业
奇纳
心理信息
实习
医学教育
批判性评价
医学
随机对照试验
系统回顾
护理部
梅德林
心理学
替代医学
心理干预
政治学
法学
病理
外科
作者
Sara Pedregosa,Núria Fabrellas,Ester Risco,Mariana Pereira,Ewa Dmoch–Gajzlerska,Fisun Şenuzun,Sandra Martin,Adelaida Zabalegui
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104582
摘要
This systematic review examines the effectiveness of academic-practice partnership models which include clinical faculty and clinical mentor roles in improving nursing students' clinical learning when compared with traditional models. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched to locate Randomized Control Trials and quasi-experimental studies published from 1999 to 2020. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to ensure methodological quality. Fourteen studies were included in the review. The Collaborative Teaching Model and the Dedicated Education Unit model were tested in randomized controlled trials. Dedicated Education Unit, Dedicated Education Centre, Clinical Education Units, Education Partnership model, Collaborative educational-practice model and Collaborative clinical practicum model were evaluated in four experimental studies and ten quasi-experimental studies. Studies did not include patient participation, and staff and faculty had anecdotal presence. There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of academic-practice partnership models. However, the complementary roles of clinical faculty and clinical mentor, in addition to education and health institutions managers commitment could successfully facilitate students' clinical learning.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI