放射免疫扩散
大流行
流感疫苗
血凝素(流感)
病毒学
接种疫苗
医学
生物
微生物学
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)
病毒
免疫学
抗体
病理
传染病(医学专业)
疾病
作者
Changgui Li,Ming Shao,Xiaoyu Cui,Ye Song,Juan Li,Li‐Ming Yuan,Han-Hua Fang,Zhenglun Liang,Terry D. Cyr,Feng-xiang Li,Xuguang Li,Junzhi Wang
出处
期刊:Biologicals
[Elsevier]
日期:2010-03-01
卷期号:38 (2): 284-289
被引量:33
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.biologicals.2009.12.004
摘要
The single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) method currently used to determine the hemagglutinin (HA) content of the inactivated influenza vaccines depends on the availability of reference HA antigen and corresponding anti-serum, updated and provided annually by World Health Organization (WHO) collaborative centers. Particularly early in a pandemic outbreak, reference reagents could be the bottleneck in vaccine development and release. Therefore, other reliable tests capable of quantifying HA content could substantially shorten the time needed for vaccine formulation. Here electrophoretic separation of deglycosylated samples in conjunction with densitometry was used to quantify HA contents of H1N1 vaccine at multiple manufacturing sites. We found the overall consistency between the alternative method and traditional SRID was 88–122% in seven lots of vaccine bulks from four subtypes (types) of influenza vaccine, confirming its suitability to quantify HA content. Moreover, we used the alternative method to prepare a national HA antigen reference in China for quality control of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccines prior to the arrival of the WHO SRID reference standards, subsequently confirming good agreement between both methods. The alternative method for vaccine quantification enabled the Chinese health authority to approve H1N1 vaccine 1 month earlier than otherwise possible.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI