概念化
组织公正
规范性
物化(马克思主义)
社会学
程序正义
构造(python库)
组织行为学
经济正义
认识论
实证研究
心理学
政治学
社会心理学
感知
组织承诺
法学
计算机科学
程序设计语言
政治
哲学
人工智能
作者
Deborah E. Rupp,Debra L. Shapiro,Robert Folger,Daniel P. Skarlicki,Ruodan Shao
标识
DOI:10.5465/annals.2014.0051
摘要
This paper provides a historical review of the conceptualization and measurement of organizational justice. We demonstrate how, over time, a dominant norm for conceptualizing and measuring justice has emerged. We posit that although consistent conceptualization and measurement across justice studies can enable the accumulation of knowledge, if the dominant approach is incomplete, this can impede the accumulation of knowledge and risk construct reification. We suggest that these risks are high given that (a) contemporary approaches to measuring fairness perceptions fail to capture the full domain of organizational justice as it was initially conceptualized by early scholars; (b) despite a foundation of “classic” theories, our field has yet to systematically map the justice domain; and (c) the normative operationalizations of organizational justice are based on observations that predate the 21st century workplace. We offer suggestions for future research and new approaches to assessing workplace fairness. Our paper’s goal, ultimately, is to reconsider how justice is conceptualized and measured so that the findings obtained from future empirical justice studies can go beyond the constraints of the current paradigm.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI