Lithium in the treatment of acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

锂(药物) 荟萃分析 安慰剂 双相情感障碍 萧条(经济学) 内科学 心理学 医学 精神科 病理 替代医学 经济 宏观经济学
作者
Jeffrey J. Rakofsky,Michael J. Lucido,Boadie W. Dunlop
出处
期刊:Journal of Affective Disorders [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:308: 268-280 被引量:17
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.058
摘要

To evaluate lithium in the treatment of acute bipolar depression.We conducted a systematic literature review for: 1) cross-over or parallel-group design studies comparing lithium response in bipolar versus unipolar depressed patients, and 2) parallel group studies of bipolar depressed patients comparing lithium versus placebo or other psychotropics. Meta-analyses using response rate as the primary outcome were conducted to evaluate lithium's efficacy.The literature search yielded 947 records. Ultimately, 17 studies were included, totaling 1545 patients, including 676 who received lithium. The overall summary effects reveal that there were no statistically significant differences between lithium versus antidepressants or placebo, however, lithium performed numerically worse than antidepressants (RR = 0.61; 95%CI, 0.37-1.02; p = 0.06) but better than placebo (RR = 1.18; 95%CI, 0.99-1.41; p = 0.07). The specificity of lithium for bipolar versus unipolar depression was not supported in the primary analysis of all trials, though an analysis limited to double-blinded, monotherapy, cross-over studies revealed a statistically significant result supporting lithium's efficacy for those with bipolar depression.Limitations include study selection rules, the use of response rates rather than remission rates or continuous score outcomes, and the small number of studies included in each meta-analysis.These meta-analyses do not support lithium as a first-line treatment for acute bipolar depression. However, the bipolar vs. unipolar sensitivity analysis and the modest, though non-significant advantage over placebo suggest lithium may still be a viable treatment option. Larger and more rigorously-designed studies are needed to determine lithium's full range of efficacy relative to placebo and other psychotropics.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
田様应助木林森采纳,获得10
1秒前
专注鸵鸟发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
迷城发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
Akim应助徐泽芃采纳,获得10
2秒前
3秒前
xingcheng发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
发发发完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
无名指发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
顾矜应助fh采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
10秒前
12秒前
xingcheng完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
cyyyyyy发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
张平一发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
15秒前
视野胤发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
SYLH应助jake采纳,获得10
17秒前
leey发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
迷人尔蓝发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
21秒前
Clarina关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
优秀小笼包完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
22秒前
23秒前
25秒前
大个应助miracle采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
H_C发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
布朗尼发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
wkjfh应助bluesky采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 4000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 3000
Animal Physiology 2000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Am Rande der Geschichte : mein Leben in China / Ruth Weiss 1500
CENTRAL BOOKS: A BRIEF HISTORY 1939 TO 1999 by Dave Cope 1000
Machine Learning Methods in Geoscience 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3736398
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3280208
关于积分的说明 10019221
捐赠科研通 2996907
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1644321
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 781918
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 749626