基因检测
胰腺癌
医学
遗传咨询
癌症
随机对照试验
医疗保健服务
医疗保健
家庭医学
重症监护医学
内科学
遗传学
生物
经济
经济增长
作者
Nicolette J. Rodriguez,C. Sloane Furniss,Matthew B. Yurgelun,Chinedu Ukaegbu,Pamela E. Constantinou,Ileana Fortes,Alyson Caruso,Alison Schwartz,Jill E. Stopfer,Meghan Underhill‐Blazey,Barbara Kenner,Scott H. Nelson,Sydney Okumura,Alicia Y. Zhou,Tara B. Coffin,Hajime Uno,Miki Horiguchi,Allyson J. Ocean,Florencia McAllister,Andrew M. Lowy
出处
期刊:Gastroenterology
[Elsevier BV]
日期:2024-02-05
卷期号:166 (5): 872-885.e2
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.042
摘要
Background & Aims
Genetic testing uptake for cancer susceptibility in family members of patients with cancer is suboptimal. Among relatives of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), The GENetic Education, Risk Assessment, and TEsting (GENERATE) study evaluated 2 online genetic education/testing delivery models and their impact on patient-reported psychological outcomes. Methods
Eligible participants had ≥1 first-degree relative with PDAC, or ≥1 first-/second-degree relative with PDAC with a known pathogenic germline variant in 1 of 13 PDAC predisposition genes. Participants were randomized by family, between May 8, 2019, and June 1, 2021. Arm 1 participants underwent a remote interactive telemedicine session and online genetic education. Arm 2 participants were offered online genetic education only. All participants were offered germline testing. The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake, compared by permutation tests and mixed-effects logistic regression models. We hypothesized that Arm 1 participants would have a higher genetic testing uptake than Arm 2. Validated surveys were administered to assess patient-reported anxiety, depression, and cancer worry at baseline and 3 months postintervention. Results
A total of 424 families were randomized, including 601 participants (n = 296 Arm 1; n = 305 Arm 2), 90% of whom completed genetic testing (Arm 1 [87%]; Arm 2 [93%], P = .014). Arm 1 participants were significantly less likely to complete genetic testing compared with Arm 2 participants (adjusted ratio [Arm1/Arm2] 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78–0.98). Among participants who completed patient-reported psychological outcomes questionnaires (Arm 1 [n = 194]; Arm 2 [n = 206]), the intervention did not affect mean anxiety, depression, or cancer worry scores. Conclusions
Remote genetic education and testing can be a successful and complementary option for delivering genetics care. (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03762590)
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI