This study tests the impact of the addition of autonomous computed tomography (CT) interpreting software to radiologist assessment of pulmonary nodules.Computed tomography scans for nodule assessment were identified retrospectively. Lung cancer risk factors, initial radiologist (RAD) report, Philips Lung Nodule software report (computer-aided nodule (CAD)) and radiologist report following the review of CT images and CAD (RAD + CAD) were collected. Follow-up recommendations based on current guidelines were derived from each report.In all, 100 patients were studied. Median maximal diameter of the largest nodule reported by RAD and RAD + CAD were similar at 10.0 and 9.0 mm, respectively (p = 0.06) but were reported as larger by CAD at 11.8 mm (p < 0.001). Follow-up recommendations derived from RAD + CAD were less intensive in 23 (23%) and more intensive in 34 (34%) than that of RAD.This study suggests that autonomous software use can alter radiologist assessment of pulmonary nodules such that suggested follow-up is altered.