Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social–ecological networks

生态系统服务 相互依存 类型学 主流化 清晰 领域(数学) 服务(商务) 环境资源管理 生态系统 生态学 社会学 业务 环境科学 生物 社会科学 生物化学 数学 营销 特殊教育 纯数学 教育学 人类学
作者
María R. Felipe‐Lucia,Angela M. Guerrero,Steven M. Alexander,Jaime Ashander,Jacopo A. Baggio,Michele L. Barnes,Örjan Bodin,Aletta Bonn,Marie‐Josée Fortin,Rachel Friedman,Jessica A. Gephart,Kate J. Helmstedt,Aislyn A. Keyes,Kailin Kroetz,François Massol,Michael J. O. Pocock,Jesse S. Sayles,Ross M. Thompson,Spencer A. Wood,Laura E. Dee
出处
期刊:Trends in Ecology and Evolution [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:37 (3): 211-222 被引量:72
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.012
摘要

Social–ecological networks (SENs) provide a promising approach to represent the complex ecological, social, and social–ecological relationships that influence ecosystems service supply. Ecosystem services can be represented in SENs as nodes, links, attributes, or as emergent properties of the network, each bringing distinct aspects of ecosystem services into focus to address different questions. Applications of SENs in ecosystem service research can foster: (i) understanding of the social and ecological drivers of ecosystem services; (ii) forecasting of the impacts of stressors; (iii) investigation of trade-offs between ecosystem services; and (iv) assessment of the effects of alternative management options. Ecosystem service research would benefit from a typology to conceptualize particular ecosystem services in SEN analyses and from greater clarity of when ecosystem service research can benefit from a SEN approach. Social–ecological networks (SENs) represent the complex relationships between ecological and social systems and are a useful tool for analyzing and managing ecosystem services. However, mainstreaming the application of SENs in ecosystem service research has been hindered by a lack of clarity about how to match research questions to ecosystem service conceptualizations in SEN (i.e., as nodes, links, attributes, or emergent properties). Building from different disciplines, we propose a typology to represent ecosystem service in SENs and identify opportunities and challenges of using SENs in ecosystem service research. Our typology provides guidance for this growing field to improve research design and increase the breadth of questions that can be addressed with SEN to understand human–nature interdependencies in a changing world. Social–ecological networks (SENs) represent the complex relationships between ecological and social systems and are a useful tool for analyzing and managing ecosystem services. However, mainstreaming the application of SENs in ecosystem service research has been hindered by a lack of clarity about how to match research questions to ecosystem service conceptualizations in SEN (i.e., as nodes, links, attributes, or emergent properties). Building from different disciplines, we propose a typology to represent ecosystem service in SENs and identify opportunities and challenges of using SENs in ecosystem service research. Our typology provides guidance for this growing field to improve research design and increase the breadth of questions that can be addressed with SEN to understand human–nature interdependencies in a changing world. network depicting ecological entities, such as species, functional groups, or patches, and the processes that connect them (e.g., species interactions, connectivity through dispersal). material or immaterial benefits people receive from nature. They are often classified as provisioning (e.g., food, water), cultural (e.g., learning, inspiration, aesthetic value), and regulating (e.g., carbon sequestration, water purification). The Nature Contributions to People [1.Díaz S. et al.The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people.Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015; 14: 1-16Crossref Scopus (1137) Google Scholar] concept can also be used. rate at which people use ecosystem services derived from a stock (for provisioning and cultural services) or regulating services derived from species interactions (e.g., predation). an overall outcome, or property of the network, which results from the interactions between network components. connection between two nodes (e.g., dispersal between patches, resource exchange between actors); synonyms are arc, edge, interaction, and tie. a family of networks that model multiple layers of information. Multilevel networks include multiple types of nodes (called multipartite), as in Figure 1. Multilayer (or multirelational) networks allow multiple kinds of links between nodes. Certain multilevel approaches (called multiplex networks) incorporate multiple link types (e.g., trophic and mutualistic interactions [72.Pilosof S. et al.The multilayer nature of ecological networks.Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2017; 1: 0101Crossref PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar]) between nodes of the same kind. Here, we loosely use the term ‘multilayer; to refer to all of these networks. Related concepts include multinetworks and networks of networks. a system of connected entities (nodes) and their pattern of interactions conceptualized and/or analyzed to understand how relations between entities of interest affect specific outcomes and/or are the results of specific underlying processes. an identifiable component of a network (e.g., user, beneficiary, species); synonyms are actor, alter, ego, entity, and vertex. a characteristic of a node (e.g., market price of a fish; Figure 1). a network that considers connections within and between the social and ecological layers (i.e., a fully articulated [2.Sayles J.S. et al.Social–ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future.Environ. Res. Lett. 2019; 14093003Crossref Scopus (37) Google Scholar] or type III [9.Kluger L.C. et al.Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens: a systematic review.People Nat. 2020; 2: 1100-1116Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar] network), in contrast to ecological networks or social networks, which account only for interactions within one of these layers. For simplicity, we also consider as SENs those networks that only include the interactions between social and ecological nodes (i.e., partially articulated [2.Sayles J.S. et al.Social–ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future.Environ. Res. Lett. 2019; 14093003Crossref Scopus (37) Google Scholar] or type II [9.Kluger L.C. et al.Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens: a systematic review.People Nat. 2020; 2: 1100-1116Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar] networks). network depicting interactions (e.g., knowledge exchange, trust, collaboration, resource sharing) between social actors (e.g., individuals, communities, organizations).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
3秒前
皮老师发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
幸福大白完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
Cml发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
河大谢广坤完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
111111发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
11秒前
陌予发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
缓慢的开山完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
ash完成签到,获得积分20
20秒前
20秒前
21秒前
英俊的铭应助月月采纳,获得10
24秒前
ash发布了新的文献求助100
24秒前
周也发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
文献菜鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
淅淅12345完成签到,获得积分20
25秒前
小二郎应助zhan采纳,获得10
25秒前
28秒前
28秒前
osmanthus完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
feng1235完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
拓木幸子完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
热心市民小红花应助陈昊采纳,获得10
31秒前
32秒前
lcr发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
Ginkgo完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
安静海露完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
35秒前
zhan完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
顾矜应助anna采纳,获得10
36秒前
朴素的士晋完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
38秒前
思源应助YJ888采纳,获得10
38秒前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 500
‘Unruly’ Children: Historical Fieldnotes and Learning Morality in a Taiwan Village (New Departures in Anthropology) 400
Indomethacinのヒトにおける経皮吸収 400
Phylogenetic study of the order Polydesmida (Myriapoda: Diplopoda) 370
基于可调谐半导体激光吸收光谱技术泄漏气体检测系统的研究 350
Robot-supported joining of reinforcement textiles with one-sided sewing heads 320
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3989069
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3531351
关于积分的说明 11253589
捐赠科研通 3269939
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1804851
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 882074
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 809073