观点
指挥与控制
计算机科学
控制(管理)
系统工程
设计要素和原则
系统设计
风险分析(工程)
软件工程
工程类
人工智能
业务
电信
艺术
视觉艺术
作者
Ray Hsienho Chang,Joseph Trainor
出处
期刊:International journal of mass emergencies and disasters
日期:2020-11-01
卷期号:38 (3): 241-267
被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1177/028072702003800301
摘要
The Incident Command System (ICS), since its establishment in the 1980s, has been repeatedly discussed with the focuses on its pros and cons. These discussions are related to the benefits and limitations of using a mechanistic system. ICS proponents like its mechanistic design elements to command and control all responders. ICS critics, however, regard ICS mechanistic elements as hurdles to managing disaster response activities, and thus, they propose using more organic elements to design a new response system. Organizational theorists say the two types of systems are not dichotomous. It is possible the ICS has some organic design elements, and thus, cannot be treated as a pure command and control system. This research aims to explore to what degree the ICS is organic versus mechanistic. The researchers will present their analyses of two official ICS documents and three ICS online training courses, which indicates the ICS possesses both organic and mechanistic features. Results of the content analysis also demonstrate some limitations of using the ICS and show why there are so many different viewpoints toward this system.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI