医学
冲程(发动机)
四分位间距
随机对照试验
危险系数
狭窄
围手术期
外科
内科学
置信区间
机械工程
工程类
作者
Peng Gao,Xiaoxin He,Haibo Wang,Tao Wang,Daming Wang,Huaizhang Shi,Tianxiao Li,Zhenwei Zhao,Yiling Cai,Wei Wu,Wilson He,Jia Yu,Bingjie Zheng,Xuebing Feng,Colin P. Derdeyn,Adam A. Dmytriw,Yangfeng Wu,Guoguang Zhao,Liqun Jiao
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2025-03-18
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.124.049602
摘要
BACKGROUND: Whether the long-term benefit of stroke prevention when stenting is added to medical therapy (MT) over MT alone for symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis offsets the perioperative risks of the stenting has not been directly evaluated in a randomized trial. We aimed to compare the long-term (>3 years) effect of stenting versus MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis in a randomized trial. METHODS: We extended the follow-up of 358 subjects enrolled in a multicenter, open-label, randomized trial conducted at 8 centers in China. Patients with transient ischemic attack or stroke attributed to severe intracranial stenosis (70% to 99%) were recruited between March 5, 2014, and November 10, 2016. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery beyond 30 days. Other secondary outcomes included stroke in the territory of the qualifying artery, as well as disabling stroke or death after enrollment. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients (stenting 176 versus MT 182) were recruited from March 5, 2014, and followed up till January 22, 2024. The median duration of follow-up was 7.4 years (interquartile range, 6.0–8.0). The primary outcome was not significantly different (stenting 14.8% versus MT 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58–1.77]; P =0.97). No significant difference was found between groups for the secondary outcomes: stroke in the territory of qualifying artery (14.8% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.58–1.77]; P =0.97), disabling stroke or death (16.5% versus 14.3%; hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.66–1.91]; P =0.70), and death (9.1% versus 7.1%; hazard ratio, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.58–2.58]; P =0.60). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides compelling evidence that, even over prolonged observed periods, the addition of stenting to MT does not confer additional benefits to MT alone in patients with symptomatic severe intracranial artery stenosis. These results underscore the importance of MT as the cornerstone of long-term stroke prevention in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01763320.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI