医学
生物标志物
内科学
胃肠病学
脑出血
利钠肽
胶质纤维酸性蛋白
冲程(发动机)
队列
病理
蛛网膜下腔出血
免疫组织化学
心力衰竭
机械工程
生物化学
化学
工程类
作者
Alejandro Bustamante,Anna Peñalba,Cyrille Orset,Leire Azurmendi,Víctor Llombart,Alba Simats,Emili Pecharroman,Oriol Ventura,Marc Ribó,Denis Vivien,Jean Charles Sánchez,Joan Montaner
出处
期刊:Neurology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-03-05
卷期号:96 (15)
被引量:41
标识
DOI:10.1212/wnl.0000000000011742
摘要
Objective
To validate a panel of blood biomarkers to differentiate between ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with suspected stroke. Methods
Patients with suspected stroke admitted within 4.5 hours after onset were enrolled. Blood samples were collected at hospital admission. Glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP), retinol binding protein 4 (RBP-4), N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and endostatin were measured by immunoassays. Cutoff points were obtained for 100% specificity for IS. A high-sensitivity assay to measure GFAP and rapid point-of-care tests (POCTs) to measure RBP-4 and NT-proBNP were used in subsets of patients. Biomarker panels were evaluated in another cohort of 62 stroke mimics. Results
A total of 189 patients (154 IS and 35 ICH) were enrolled. Patients with IS had higher RBP-4, NT-proBNP, and endostatin and lower GFAP levels than patients with ICH. The best biomarker combination for the identification of IS was RBP-4+NT-proBNP, which was able to identify 29.7% of patients with IS with 100% specificity. In the subset of patients for whom GFAP was measured with the high-sensitivity assay, RBP-4, NT-proBNP, and GFAP identified 51.5% of patients with IS with 100% specificity. When stroke mimics were included, specificities were reduced to 98.4 and 96.8%, respectively. POCTs of RBP-4 and NT-proBNP showed results similar results to those of conventional ELISAs. Conclusions
A biomarker panel including RBP-4, NT-proBNP, and GFAP provided moderate but potentially useful sensitivity rates at 100% specificity for IS diagnosis. If confirmed in future studies, this strategy might allow prehospital treatment in selected patients. Classification of Evidence
This study provides Class I evidence that a biomarker panel including RBP-4, NT-proBNP, and GFAP distinguishes IS from ICH with moderate accuracy.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI