师徒制
奇纳
批判性评价
科克伦图书馆
系统回顾
数据提取
医学教育
工作满意度
梅德林
医学
劳动力
护理部
心理学
荟萃分析
心理干预
替代医学
社会心理学
病理
政治学
内科学
法学
经济
经济增长
作者
Isabel Vlerick,Lise‐Marie Kinnaer,Ben Delbaere,Annemarie Coolbrandt,Elsie Decoene,Laura Thomas,Ruben Vanderlinde,Ann Van Hecke
摘要
Abstract Aims (1) To identify, evaluate and summarize evidence about the objectives and characteristics of mentoring programmes for specialized nurses (SNs) or nurse navigators (NNs) and advanced practice nurses (APNs) and (2) to identify the effectiveness of these programmes. Design A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines. Data Sources From November 2022 until 7 December 2022, four databases were searched: PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library. Review Methods Study selection was performed independently by two researchers. Disagreements were discussed until consensus was reached. Data extraction was undertaken for included studies. Data synthesis was conducted using narrative analysis. Quality appraisal was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skill Programme (CASP) and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results Twelve articles were included, all of which focused on mentoring programmes for APNs. Different forms of mentorship (e.g. (in)formal mentorship, work shadowing, workshops) were reported. Studies reported positive outcomes on job retention ( n = 5), job satisfaction ( n = 6), skills improvement ( n = 7), satisfaction with the programme ( n = 7) and confidence improvement ( n = 4) among participants of mentoring programmes. Conclusion There is a lack of uniformity and consistency in various elements of mentoring programmes. Further research is needed to develop mentoring programmes for both APNs and SNs/NNs in a systematic and theoretically underpinned manner. It is necessary to establish a thorough evaluation methodology, preferably using a mixed methods design that includes both a qualitative process evaluation and a comprehensive outcome evaluation using validated questionnaires, taking into account the NN/APN, the interprofessional team and organizational level. Impact The synthesis of evidence may be useful to organizations developing and implementing mentoring programmes for both SN/NN and APN. The development of a mentoring programme for nursing experts should be considered a complex intervention that requires theoretical frameworks and contextual considerations. No Patient or Public Contribution Not applicable, as no patients or public were involved.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI