CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

报告审判综合标准 检查表 医学 批判性评价 随机对照试验 系统回顾 语句(逻辑) 心理干预 梅德林 替代医学 家庭医学 心理学 护理部 外科 病理 认知心理学 法学 政治学
作者
David Moher,Sally Hopewell,Kenneth F. Schulz,Víctor M. Montori,Peter C Gøtzsche,P.J. Devereaux,Diana Elbourne,Matthias Egger,Douglas G. Altman
出处
期刊:International Journal of Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:10 (1): 28-55 被引量:1958
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
摘要

Overwhelming evidence shows the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is not optimal. Without transparent reporting, readers cannot judge the reliability and validity of trial findings nor extract information for systematic reviews. Recent methodological analyses indicate that inadequate reporting and design are associated with biased estimates of treatment effects. Such systematic error is seriously damaging to RCTs, which are considered the gold standard for evaluating interventions because of their ability to minimise or avoid bias. A group of scientists and editors developed the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement to improve the quality of reporting of RCTs. It was first published in 1996 and updated in 2001. The statement consists of a checklist and flow diagram that authors can use for reporting an RCT. Many leading medical journals and major international editorial groups have endorsed the CONSORT statement. The statement facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of RCTs. During the 2001 CONSORT revision, it became clear that explanation and elaboration of the principles underlying the CONSORT statement would help investigators and others to write or appraise trial reports. A CONSORT explanation and elaboration article was published in 2001 alongside the 2001 version of the CONSORT statement. After an expert meeting in January 2007, the CONSORT statement has been further revised and is published as the CONSORT 2010 Statement. This update improves the wording and clarity of the previous checklist and incorporates recommendations related to topics that have only recently received recognition, such as selective outcome reporting bias. This explanatory and elaboration document—intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the CONSORT statement—has also been extensively revised. It presents the meaning and rationale for each new and updated checklist item providing examples of good reporting and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies. Several examples of flow diagrams are included. The CONSORT 2010 Statement, this revised explanatory and elaboration document, and the associated website (www.consort-statement.org) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of randomised trials.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
香蕉觅云应助KIKI采纳,获得10
2秒前
jin发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
TuT完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
朴素的梦岚完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
沉静的红酒完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
大个应助石头采纳,获得10
4秒前
无花果应助BABY五齿采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
enterdawn应助splatoon采纳,获得10
6秒前
CipherSage应助不可靠月亮采纳,获得30
7秒前
7秒前
认真不尤完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
局内人发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
期待着完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
大圣发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
HIT_WXY应助先锋老刘001采纳,获得10
10秒前
lcs发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
沫沫完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
石头完成签到,获得积分20
12秒前
我是老大应助局内人采纳,获得10
14秒前
任性的皮卡丘应助局内人采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助局内人采纳,获得10
14秒前
任性的皮卡丘应助局内人采纳,获得10
14秒前
小郭发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
BABY五齿发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
ding应助局内人采纳,获得10
14秒前
大模型应助翘啊采纳,获得10
14秒前
wjh完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
幸福糖豆完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助小王采纳,获得30
18秒前
guo发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
19秒前
顺心凡之完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
大圣完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
高分求助中
Licensing Deals in Pharmaceuticals 2019-2024 3000
Effect of reactor temperature on FCC yield 2000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 1020
Impiego dell’associazione acetazolamide/pentossifillina nel trattamento dell’ipoacusia improvvisa idiopatica in pazienti affetti da glaucoma cronico 900
PraxisRatgeber: Mantiden: Faszinierende Lauerjäger 800
錢鍾書楊絳親友書札 600
Geochemistry, 2nd Edition 地球化学经典教科书第二版,不要epub版本 431
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3295981
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2931828
关于积分的说明 8453919
捐赠科研通 2604382
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1421708
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 661190
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 644044