Optimal Method of Carotid Revascularization in Patients With Recent Myocardial Infarction

医学 内科学 冲程(发动机) 心脏病学 心肌梗塞 血运重建 单变量分析 阿司匹林 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 心力衰竭 外科 多元分析 机械工程 工程类
作者
Sharon E. Straus,Mahmoud B. Malas,Sina Zarrintan,Marjan Moghaddam,Daniel Willie-Permor
出处
期刊:Journal of Vascular Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:77 (6): e135-e136
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2023.03.186
摘要

Recent myocardial infarction (MI) represents a real challenge in patients requiring any vascular procedure. There is currently a lack of data on the effect of preoperative MI on the outcomes of carotid revascularization methodology (carotid enterectomy [CEA], transfemoral carotid artery stenting [TFCAS], or transcarotid artery revascularization [TCAR]). This study looks to identify the ideal revascularization method for patients with recent MI. Data were collected from Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) (2016-2022) for patients with carotid stenosis in the United States and Canada with recent MI (<6 months) undergoing CEA, TFCAS, or TCAR. In-hospital outcomes after TFCAS vs CEA and TCAR vs CEA were compared. We used logistic regression models to compare the outcomes of these three procedures in patients with recent MI adjusting for potential confounders. Primary outcomes included in-hospital rates of stroke, death, and MI. Secondary outcomes included stroke/death, stroke/death/MI, postoperative hypertension, postoperative hypotension, and prolonged length of stay (>2 days). The final cohort included 1217 (54.2%) CEA, 445 (19.8%) TFCAS, and 584 (26.0%) TCAR cases. Patients undergoing CEA were more likely to have prior coronary artery bypass graft/percutaneous coronary intervention and to use anticoagulant. Patients undergoing TFCAS were more likely to be symptomatic, have prior congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease, and undergo urgent operations. Patients undergoing TCAR were more likely to have higher rates of aspirin class IV-V, protamine, and P2Y12 inhibitor use. In the univariate analysis, CEA was associated with a lower rate of ipsilateral stroke (P = .079) and death (P = .002) (see Table I for secondary outcomes). After adjusting for confounders, TFCAS was associated with increased risk of stroke/death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.69; 95% CI: 1.36-5.35; P = .005) and stroke/death/MI (aOR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.07-2.60; P = .025) compared with CEA. However, TCAR had similar outcomes to CEA (Table II). Both TFCAS and TCAR were associated with increased risk of postoperative hypotension (aOR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.24-2.36; P = .001 and aOR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.37-2.41; P ≤ .001, respectively) compared with CEA. However, TCAR was associated with a decreased risk of postoperative hypertension (aOR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.75; P ≤ .001) compared with CEA (Table II). Although recent MI has been established as a high-risk criterion for CEA and an approved indication for TFCAS, this study showed that CEA is safer in this population with lower risk of stroke/death and stroke/death/MI compared with TFCAS. TCAR had similar stroke/death/MI outcomes to CEA in patients with recent MI. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.Table IPostoperative outcomes of carotid enterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI)In-hospitalUnivariableCEATFCASTCARNo. (%)No. (%)No. (%)P valueStroke27 (2.22)15 (3.40)19 (3.26).277Ipsilateral Stroke19 (1.56)14 (3.17)16 (2.74).079Death14 (1.15)17 (3.82)13 (2.23).002MI28 (2.30)8 (1.80)8 (1.37).398Stroke/death40 (3.29)29 (6.56)28 (4.79).012Stroke/death/MI60 (4.93)36 (8.14)34 (5.82).046Postoperative hypertension278 (22.84)50 (11.26)80 (13.72)<.001Postoperative hypotension187 (15.37)112 (25.23)149 (25.56)<.001Prolonged length of stay565 (46.43)233 (52.36)268 (45.89).068 Open table in a new tab Table IIPostoperative outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) vs carotid enterectomy (CEA) and transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) vs CEA in patients with preoperative myocardial infarction (MI) after adjusting for confounding factors (reference = CEA)In-hospitalMultivariableaTFCAS vs CEATCAR vs CEAOR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P valueStroke1.30 (0.69-2.47).4131.42 (0.77-2.62).260Ipsilateral stroke1.49 (0.69-3.23).3081.90 (0.87-4.11).105Death2.42 (1.00-5.89).0512.21 (0.89-5.46).086MI0.84 (0.37-1.88).6640.57 (0.24-1.34).197Stroke/death2.69 (1.36-5.35).0051.45 (0.84-2.51).185Stroke/death/MI1.67 (1.07-2.60).0251.10 (0.68-1.78).701Postoperative hypertension0.66 (0.41-1.04).0730.55 (0.39-0.75)<.001Postoperative hypotension1.71 (1.24-2.36).0011.82 (1.37-2.41)<.001Prolonged length of stay (>2 days)1.12 (0.81-1.55).4810.96 (0.72-1.27).761ASA, Aspirin; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CHF, congestive heart failure; CI, confidence interval; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.aMultivariate analysis adjusted for the following confounders: age, gender, race, ethnicity, obesity, symptomatic status, diabetes, hypertension, CHF, COPD, CKD, ASA class, prior occlusions, CABG/PCI, procedure urgency, smoking, and use of preoperative medications. Open table in a new tab
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
meta完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
大饼完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
爆米花应助WJM采纳,获得10
2秒前
xiexuqin完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
silentJeremy发布了新的文献求助200
3秒前
JonyiCheng完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科研通AI5应助典雅又夏采纳,获得10
4秒前
风趣的无剑完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
anpucle发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
跳不起来的大神完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
科研乐色完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Drew完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
挤爆沙丁鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
彭于晏应助fff采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
Agernon应助yaya采纳,获得10
6秒前
四夕完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
汉堡包应助执着的小蘑菇采纳,获得10
7秒前
西哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
搜集达人应助酷炫大树采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
外向的沅完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
bkagyin应助zy采纳,获得10
9秒前
香蕉觅云应助好了采纳,获得10
9秒前
南逸然发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
xiaohe完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
10秒前
隐形曼青应助camera采纳,获得10
10秒前
狗狗完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
SciGPT应助Melody采纳,获得10
11秒前
听粥发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小张在进步完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI5应助WNL采纳,获得10
12秒前
阿蒙发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
自觉石头完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527469
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107497
关于积分的说明 9285892
捐赠科研通 2805298
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1539865
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716714
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709678