Pain in Dementia: An Empirical Test of a Common Assumption

痴呆 考试(生物学) 实证研究 心理学 医学 物理医学与康复 认知心理学 统计 数学 内科学 地质学 疾病 古生物学
作者
Andrew I.G. McLennan,Louise I. R. Castillo,Thomas Hadjistavropoulos
出处
期刊:The Journal of Pain [Elsevier]
卷期号:25 (10): 104605-104605
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2024.104605
摘要

Numerous, and often largely overlapping, observational pain assessment tools have been developed specifically to assess pain in older adults with dementia under the assumption that a specialized approach is necessary to evaluate pain in this population. However, this assumption has never been tested empirically. As an empirical test of this implicit assumption, our goal was to compare existing tools for people living with dementia (with respect to psychometric properties), not only against each other, but also against a tool developed for a different population with cognitive impairments. Videos of older adults with severe dementia recorded in long-term care settings were coded for pain behaviors in the laboratory. Trained coders coded pain behaviors in video segments of older adults with dementia during a quiet baseline condition as well as during a physical examination (designed to identify painful areas), using various observational pain assessment tools. An observational measure of agitation was employed to facilitate the assessment of discriminant validity. Consistent with our expectations, all pain tools (including the tool developed for younger people with cognitive impairments) successfully differentiated between painful and non-painful states, with large effect sizes. This was the first study to compare tools specifically developed to assess pain in people living with dementia to a tool developed for a different population. Given that all tools under study showed satisfactory psychometric properties when tested on persons with dementia, this study suggests that the assumption that different tools are necessary for different populations with cognitive impairments cannot be taken for granted. This article challenges an implicitly held assumption that specialized tools are needed to assess pain in different populations with cognitive impairments. Given commonalities in pain expression across populations, further research is needed to determine whether population-specific tools are needed.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI

祝大家在新的一年里科研腾飞
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
2秒前
沉默的无施完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Orange应助Peter_Zhu采纳,获得10
3秒前
佳宝(不可以喝但能吃完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
完美世界应助wabg采纳,获得10
6秒前
周涛完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
嘎嘣脆发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
pipi完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
白梅发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
忘课文完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
yangy801017发布了新的文献求助200
14秒前
lopin完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
AZX加油完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
远行客HB完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
lopin发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
小乌龟完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
福明明发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
科研通AI2S应助feiying88采纳,获得10
24秒前
丘比特应助齐桓公采纳,获得10
26秒前
28秒前
英俊若灵完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
ky小白白完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
cly3397完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
30秒前
嘎嘣脆完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
32秒前
英俊若灵发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
33秒前
酷波er应助福明明采纳,获得10
33秒前
36秒前
深情安青应助xyfwz采纳,获得10
36秒前
aaa完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
spirit发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
郁成仁发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
黑闷蛋完成签到,获得积分10
39秒前
Hello应助英俊若灵采纳,获得10
40秒前
李晓萌完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
白白完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
44秒前
高分求助中
Востребованный временем 2500
诺贝尔奖与生命科学 2000
Les Mantodea de Guyane 1000
Aspects of Babylonian celestial divination: the lunar eclipse tablets of Enūma Anu Enlil 1000
Kidney Transplantation: Principles and Practice 1000
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 910
Field Guide to Insects of South Africa 660
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3380680
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2995820
关于积分的说明 8765665
捐赠科研通 2680884
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1468231
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 678902
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 670951