Determining Levels of Prescriptivism in American English Usage Guides

心理学
作者
Jordan Smith
出处
期刊:Technical Communication 卷期号:71 (2): 26-42
标识
DOI:10.55177/tc377227
摘要

Purpose: Prescriptivism–a concept concerned with “correctness in language use” (Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 2019, p. 8)–serves an important purpose when editors and other language professionals apply the findings from empirical linguistic studies to practical communication tasks (Oaks, 2021). Usage guides catalog usage rules, but they treat these rules with varying levels of prescriptivism. Therefore, advice varies across usage guides. This study empirically investigates levels of prescriptivism observed in usage guides. Method: Using a scale from 1 (minimally prescriptive) to 4 (maximally prescriptive), two raters coded the level of prescriptivism observed in entries for eight well-known usage problems (e.g., who/whom and lay/lie) from 11 current usage guides relating to American English. Based on the codes assigned to these entries, an overall prescriptivism index was calculated for each usage problem and usage guide. Results: A range in levels of prescriptivism was observed. Overall, the treatment of usage problems skewed high on the prescriptivism scale with six of the eight being treated as maximally prescriptive by at least two usage guides and six having mean indexes at or above the scale’s midpoint of 2.50. Similarly, seven of the 11 usage guides gave maximally prescriptive advice for at least one usage problem and eight had mean indexes at or above 2.50. While these findings indicate a bias toward prescriptive advice, a noteworthy amount of prescription-breaking advice was also observed. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that usage guides vary considerably in their levels of prescriptivism; therefore, writers and editors must critically consider which advice to follow.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
典雅碧空完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
4秒前
可靠靖琪发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
yzhwzh完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
香蕉觅云应助棋士采纳,获得10
6秒前
Hhd完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
英俊的铭应助Lost采纳,获得10
8秒前
Jaden完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
田轲发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
安静的棉花糖完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
Mrmao0213发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
liagse完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
杳鸢应助啊哈哈哈哈采纳,获得10
14秒前
X子千完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
思源应助Zirong采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
棋士发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
cc发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
21秒前
半凡发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
顷梦完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
史小菜应助David采纳,获得20
23秒前
可乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
chr发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Akim应助笨笨松采纳,获得10
26秒前
善良的冷梅完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
Ava应助可靠靖琪采纳,获得10
27秒前
潇洒闭月完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
乐乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
29秒前
阮大帅气完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
情怀应助ZQ采纳,获得10
31秒前
李健的粉丝团团长应助cc采纳,获得10
31秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助自觉的剑身采纳,获得10
32秒前
wxywxy完成签到,获得积分20
33秒前
赘婿应助LILI采纳,获得10
34秒前
chr完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
高分求助中
The Mother of All Tableaux Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 2400
Ophthalmic Equipment Market by Devices(surgical: vitreorentinal,IOLs,OVDs,contact lens,RGP lens,backflush,diagnostic&monitoring:OCT,actorefractor,keratometer,tonometer,ophthalmoscpe,OVD), End User,Buying Criteria-Global Forecast to2029 2000
Optimal Transport: A Comprehensive Introduction to Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Applications 800
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL 600
ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, 12th edition 588
T/CIET 1202-2025 可吸收再生氧化纤维素止血材料 500
Interpretation of Mass Spectra, Fourth Edition 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3951026
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3496458
关于积分的说明 11082124
捐赠科研通 3226913
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1784016
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 868165
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 801003