Determining Levels of Prescriptivism in American English Usage Guides

心理学
作者
Jordan Smith
出处
期刊:Technical Communication 卷期号:71 (2): 26-42
标识
DOI:10.55177/tc377227
摘要

Purpose: Prescriptivism–a concept concerned with “correctness in language use” (Tieken-Boon van Ostade, 2019, p. 8)–serves an important purpose when editors and other language professionals apply the findings from empirical linguistic studies to practical communication tasks (Oaks, 2021). Usage guides catalog usage rules, but they treat these rules with varying levels of prescriptivism. Therefore, advice varies across usage guides. This study empirically investigates levels of prescriptivism observed in usage guides. Method: Using a scale from 1 (minimally prescriptive) to 4 (maximally prescriptive), two raters coded the level of prescriptivism observed in entries for eight well-known usage problems (e.g., who/whom and lay/lie) from 11 current usage guides relating to American English. Based on the codes assigned to these entries, an overall prescriptivism index was calculated for each usage problem and usage guide. Results: A range in levels of prescriptivism was observed. Overall, the treatment of usage problems skewed high on the prescriptivism scale with six of the eight being treated as maximally prescriptive by at least two usage guides and six having mean indexes at or above the scale’s midpoint of 2.50. Similarly, seven of the 11 usage guides gave maximally prescriptive advice for at least one usage problem and eight had mean indexes at or above 2.50. While these findings indicate a bias toward prescriptive advice, a noteworthy amount of prescription-breaking advice was also observed. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that usage guides vary considerably in their levels of prescriptivism; therefore, writers and editors must critically consider which advice to follow.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
和谐的夏岚完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
华杰发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
浅梦星河发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
嘻嘻哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
脑洞疼应助小怪采纳,获得10
1秒前
1秒前
是瓜瓜不完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
geather发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
sjc完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
文静的糖豆完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
不如看海完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
生动灵萱发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
八森木完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
4秒前
wanci应助科研顺利采纳,获得10
5秒前
杨家赘婿发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
热心水之完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
项锡凯完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
flying蝈蝈发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
徐rl完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
爆裂水龙头完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
YoungLee完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
科研助理发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
ziru完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
白白胖胖完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
机灵铭完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
嘻嘻哈哈完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
skysleeper完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
cangmingzi完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
14秒前
木心o完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI6应助是阿杰帅哥采纳,获得10
15秒前
雨点完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
浅梦星河完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
Chen完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems Third Edition 2000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5600096
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4685809
关于积分的说明 14839646
捐赠科研通 4674865
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2538486
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1505659
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471109